- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 15:34:52 +0200
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>2. That those who think rdf:type should not be used, try
> suggesting a better alternative (other than xsi:type).
Off the top of my head, could we use
rdf:parseType=Absolute-URI
?
PROS
- don't extend the vocab
- current parsers won't do too badly
CONS
- have to distinguish URI from
"Resource" "Literal" and "Collection"
I haven't thought this through yet, any other thoughts?
Jeremy
Received on Monday, 2 September 2002 09:36:27 UTC