- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 15:35:15 +0100
- To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 16:22 26/09/2002 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote: [...] > > > > I suggested in: > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0284.html > > > > [[model.contains(c, d, a.getProperty(b).getObject())]] > > > > was an accurate representation of the entailment. Would you accept that? > >I would accept it as *one* possible string-based interpretation >of inline literals expressed using the Jena API, but not any >fixed string-based interpretation mandated nor even suggested by >the Jena API. The question was: Is the above expression an accurate representation of the entailment in the jena API? I think that is a question which deserved a yes/no answer. If you answer yes, then we can look for an equivalent in XMP. I am not sure what your answer means. Also you haven't responded to my difficulty in understanding what consistent test you are applying to reach your conclusions. I doesn't seem like this discussion is making progress. Time to end it perhaps. Brian
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 11:02:53 UTC