- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 17:13:39 +0100
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- CC: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Dave Beckett wrote: > > Why is this question being asked? > I share this concern. The test cases should: - test how RDF and RDF/XML work. - test how RDF interacts with other standards where there is doubt. I agree with Dave's analysis that there is no doubt here and so think we should avoid this test case as the thin end of a very thick wedge. Do we need to show how RDF/XML interacts with entity refs, chracter refs, external entities, various badly formed XML thingies, relative namespaces that have been deprecated according to the plenary decision, .... As an implementator I need to be aware of these issues (or delegate them to library code), but that doesn't necessarily make them appropriate things to test. I believe that we have test cases already that use entities for the namespace declarations, and I will be surprised if we don't use an entity for &xsd; in our datatyping test cases, but perhaps we shouldn't have a specific test to demonstrate this. I think I would abstain if this test case were put for approval. Jeremy
Received on Monday, 30 September 2002 12:14:30 UTC