Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-09-13

Time:
10:00:00 Fri Sep 13 2002 in America/New York

which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Sep 13 2002 in Europe/London

Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore

1: Scribes
This weeks volunteer scribe is Eric Miller
Volunteer to scribe next week


2: Roll Call


3: Review Agenda


4: Next telecon 20th Sept 2002


5: Minutes of 2002-09-06 telecon

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0081.html


6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions

ACTION: 2002-05-17#1 DaveB
Investigate issue faq-html-compliance and propose a resolution

see:
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#faq-html-compliance

ACTION: 2002-08-30#1 AaronSw
Publish new MIME Type Internet Draft.

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0122.html

ACTION: 2002-09-06#3 bwm
ensure credit for DT document contents is not lost

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0120.html

ACTION: 2002-09-06#5 bwm
as series editor: solicit aid from DT document editors in assigning parts of the document to other doc editors.

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0125.html



7: Confirm Status of Withdrawn Actions

ACTION: 2002-05-17#3 jjc
Propose new text to describe serialization of b-nodes.



8: Review of namespaces last call
Propose approve Jeremy's comments as in 

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0068.html

[[[
Our comments on the first working draft have been 
more than adequately addressed.
The namespaces 1.1 Last Call draft is compatible 
with the use of XML Namespaces by RDF.
In fact, we intend to copy your section 7, on IRIs verbatim,
unless you get to Rec before we get to last call.
]]]
  


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0058.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0068.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0091.html


9: Datatypes
Discuss proposed actions for splitting up datatypes doc

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0125.html  



See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0257.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0125.html


10: Recognition for datatypes editors
Discuss proposal in

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0120.html  



See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0120.html


11: Abstract Syntax for Literals
Discuss proposals.
    


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0123.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0127.html


12: Tidyness of untyped Literals
Discuss.    



13: Frank's new assertion text
2002-08-23#7  FrankM  Propose alternative text for the concepts and abstract
                 model document to rectify concerns with conflicting use of 
                 "assertion".


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0226.html
  http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-basics/2002-08-05/Overview.htm#section-Social



------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant

Received on Thursday, 12 September 2002 13:16:55 UTC