w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from September 2002 by author

Aaron Swartz

• why I object (was: Intentions of XMP) (Friday, 27 September)
• New I-D Up (Wednesday, 11 September)

Brian McBride

• Re: test case: is RDF/XML layered on XML? (Monday, 30 September)
• Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 1) (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: Proposal for Deferrment and Closure (was Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) (Monday, 30 September)
• test case: is RDF/XML layered on XML? (Sunday, 29 September)
• clarify "inline literals" (Saturday, 28 September)
• Re: Explanation? of difference between Patrick and Brian [was: Re: Intentions of XMP] (Saturday, 28 September)
• Re: 2002-09-27 telecon minutes (Saturday, 28 September)
• new postponed issue #rdf-embedded (Saturday, 28 September)
• Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision (Friday, 27 September)
• Explanation? of difference between Patrick and Brian [was: Re: Intentions of XMP] (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: Intentions of XMP (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Intentions of XMP (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation (Thursday, 26 September)
• Weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: monotonicity [was: Re: On Consensus] (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: The case for untidy literal semantics (Wednesday, 25 September)
• monotonicity [was: Re: On Consensus] (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20 (Wednesday, 25 September)
• The case for untidy literal semantics (Tuesday, 24 September)
• RE: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Tuesday, 24 September)
• On Consensus (Tuesday, 24 September)
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Monday, 23 September)
• Fwd: Proposed LC review of SOAP Attachment Feature doc (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: Issue: rdfs-container-membership-superProperty (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: Issue #rdf-containers-otherapproaches (Thursday, 19 September)
• Minutes of telecon 2002-09-13 (Thursday, 19 September)
• Fwd: Erratum to XML 1.0 spec to allow xml:lang="" (Thursday, 19 September)
• weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Kudos to the primer editors and contributors (Tuesday, 17 September)
• decision time: semantics of non-datatyped literals (Monday, 16 September)
• aob for the telecon fwd: Technical Plenary Logistics -- please reply by 30 September (Friday, 13 September)
• Re: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: New I-D Up (Thursday, 12 September)
• 2002-09-06#5 Datatype actions (Thursday, 12 September)
• weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 11 September)
• In recognition of the efforts of PatH, Sergey and PatS on datatypes (Wednesday, 11 September)
• RE: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case (Wednesday, 11 September)
• RE: Datatyping, reification, syntactic tidyness (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: Datatyping, reification, syntactic tidyness (Wednesday, 11 September)
• faq-html-compliance is closed (Monday, 9 September)
• Untyped Literal Semantics (Monday, 9 September)
• should be 2002-09-06 [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-30] (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags (Friday, 6 September)
• Fwd: Helpers for specification editors (Friday, 6 September)
• Distributing Datatypes Part 1 amongst the other docs (Thursday, 5 September)
• Fwd: to eds: document technologies survey (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Fwd: Last call announcement for Namespaces 1.1 (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Proposals for changes to current datatyping spec (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" (Wednesday, 4 September)
• RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Re: 2002-08-23#6 Ensure that WG home page points to current editor working drafts (Wednesday, 4 September)
• 2002-08-23#6 Ensure that WG home page points to current editor working drafts (Tuesday, 3 September)

bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com

• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-09-27 (Friday, 27 September)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-09-20 (Thursday, 19 September)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-09-13 (Thursday, 12 September)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-30 (Thursday, 5 September)

Dan Brickley

• Re: The case for untidy literal semantics (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Fwd: Proposed LC review of SOAP Attachment Feature doc (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: Issue: rdfs-container-membership-superProperty (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: Distributing Datatypes Part 1 amongst the other docs (Thursday, 5 September)

Dan Connolly

• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: test case: is RDF/XML layered on XML? (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: xml:lang and XML infoset: two new datatypes (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: Issue #rdf-containers-otherapproaches (Thursday, 19 September)

Dave Beckett

• Re: test case: is RDF/XML layered on XML? (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: datatype explanations questions (Friday, 20 September)
• Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: Erratum to XML 1.0 spec to allow xml:lang="" (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: An observation about rdf:Seq (Thursday, 19 September)
• Regrets for 2002-08-13 telecon (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: XML Base - should be used (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Re: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Re: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals (Monday, 2 September)
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals (Monday, 2 September)
• Minutes of RDF Core WG telcon, 2002-08-30 (Monday, 2 September)

Eric Miller

• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 1) (Monday, 30 September)
• Reopening tidy/untidy decision (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: 2002-08-23#6 Ensure that WG home page points to current editor working drafts (Thursday, 5 September)

Frank Manola

• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 1) (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: why I object (was: Intentions of XMP) (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: monotonicity [was: Re: On Consensus] (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: The case for untidy literal semantics (Tuesday, 24 September)
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20 (Tuesday, 24 September)
• Re: On Consensus (Tuesday, 24 September)
• datatype explanations questions (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: 2002-08-23#6 Ensure that WG home page points to current editor working drafts (Tuesday, 3 September)
• regrets for Sept 6 teleconference (Monday, 2 September)

freshsponsor

• Gentile utente Telecom italia (Friday, 20 September)

Graham Klyne

• Re: test case: is RDF/XML layered on XML? (Monday, 30 September)
• Datatyped literals, another "test case" (Monday, 30 September)
• Untyped literals/datatyping: another test case (Monday, 30 September)
• Redesigning CC/PP for tidy literals (Friday, 27 September)
• 2002-09-27 telecon minutes (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: a cunning plan (was: Re: On Consensus) (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: a cunning plan (was: Re: On Consensus) (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: RDF lists (Friday, 27 September)
• RE: Technical change to the RDFS MT (test cases in n3) (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: monotonicity [was: Re: On Consensus] (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: monotonicity [was: Re: On Consensus] (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20, ACTION 2002-09-20#2 ("assertion") (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Tidy vs untidy literals: 2 test cases motivated by CC/PP (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: RDF lists (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: RDF lists (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: Fwd: Proposed LC review of SOAP Attachment Feature doc (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: RDF lists (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: Issue #rdf-containers-otherapproaches (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: Technical change to the RDFS MT (Thursday, 19 September)
• An observation about rdf:Seq (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Issue #rdf-containers-otherapproaches (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Issue: rdfs-container-membership-superProperty (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: decision time: semantics of non-datatyped literals (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RDF concepts -- editors' issue list (Monday, 16 September)
• Re: Datatypes, abstract syntax / data model. (Saturday, 14 September)
• Discussing tidiness of untyped RDF literals (Friday, 13 September)
• Re: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1 (Tuesday, 10 September)
• Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1) (Tuesday, 10 September)
• Comments on new datatyping document, part 1 (Monday, 9 September)
• Re: in line literal semantics (and some thoughts on CC/PP) (Monday, 9 September)
• Re: Draft minutes: telecon 2002-09-06 (namespace last call) (Monday, 9 September)
• Re: 2002-08-23#6 Ensure that WG home page points to current editor working drafts (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: Comments on datatyping draft (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Datatyping, rdf?:Datatype unnecessary (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: Datatypes Draft Questions & Comments (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: xsi:type not specializable [was: datatypes status (Thursday, 5 September)

Jan Grant

• Regrets for _next_ week's telecon (2002-10-04) (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: a cunning plan (was: Re: On Consensus) (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: The case for untidy literal semantics (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: syntax and semantics (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Sunday, 22 September)
• Datatypes, abstract syntax / data model. (Friday, 13 September)
• Re: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) (Friday, 13 September)
• Re: Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1) (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: in line literal semantics (Monday, 9 September)
• Draft minutes: telecon 2002-09-06 (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: Proposals for changes to current datatyping spec (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Proposals for changes to current datatyping spec (Wednesday, 4 September)
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" (Monday, 2 September)
• RE: RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals (Monday, 2 September)
• RE: Datatyping, rdf?:Datatype unnecessary (Monday, 2 September)
• Datatyping, rdf?:Datatype unnecessary (Sunday, 1 September)
• Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate (Sunday, 1 September)

Jeremy Carroll

• Re: test case: is RDF/XML layered on XML? (Monday, 30 September)
• possible partial regrets (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20 (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Minutes: 2002-09-20 (retry) (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: On Consensus (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: On Consensus (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20 (Tuesday, 24 September)
• Re: The case for untidy literal semantics (Tuesday, 24 September)
• Minutes: 2002-09-20 (Tuesday, 24 September)
• RE: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Tuesday, 24 September)
• RE: On Consensus (Tuesday, 24 September)
• RE: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: Technical change to the RDFS MT (test cases in n3) (Monday, 23 September)
• Abstract data model update - discussion (Saturday, 21 September)
• RE: Technical change to the RDFS MT (Thursday, 19 September)
• RE: Erratum to XML 1.0 spec to allow xml:lang="" (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: Issue #rdf-containers-otherapproaches (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: daml:collection is just Literal test: need help with details [was: current action list] (Tuesday, 17 September)
• Re: WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-05-31 (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RE: decision time: semantics of non-datatyped literals (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RE: Datatypes, abstract syntax / data model. (Monday, 16 September)
• RE: Datatypes, abstract syntax / data model. (Friday, 13 September)
• Re: abstract syntax representation of inline literals (Friday, 13 September)
• abstract syntax representation of inline literals (Friday, 13 September)
• RE: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case (Wednesday, 11 September)
• RE: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case (Wednesday, 11 September)
• RE: Datatyping, reification, syntactic tidyness (Wednesday, 11 September)
• RE: Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1) (Wednesday, 11 September)
• RE: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Datatyping, reification, syntactic tidyness (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case (Wednesday, 11 September)
• RE: Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1) (Tuesday, 10 September)
• in line literal semantics (Sunday, 8 September)
• Re: Fwd: Last call announcement for Namespaces 1.1 (Friday, 6 September)
• RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Re: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" (Monday, 2 September)
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals (Monday, 2 September)
• Document structure (Monday, 2 September)
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate (Monday, 2 September)
• XML Base - should be used (Monday, 2 September)
• RE: RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals (Monday, 2 September)

Jos De_Roo

• Re: clarify "inline literals" (Saturday, 28 September)
• Re: results of untidy experiment (Saturday, 28 September)
• results of untidy experiment (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: datatype property in the statement object pair (Friday, 27 September)
• datatype property in the statement object pair (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20 (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: Tidy/untidy: that's all about assumptions, folks (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20 (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: monotonicity [was: Re: On Consensus] (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: Tidy vs untidy literals: 2 test cases motivated by CC/PP (Wednesday, 25 September)
• RE: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Tuesday, 24 September)
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Tuesday, 24 September)
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Tuesday, 24 September)
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Tuesday, 24 September)
• RE: Technical change to the RDFS MT (test cases in n3) (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: Technical change to the RDFS MT (test cases in n3) (Monday, 23 September)
• DECIDED: untidy semantics (Saturday, 21 September)
• Re: RDF lists (Friday, 20 September)
• possible regrets for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-09-20 (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: RDF lists (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: Datatypes, abstract syntax / data model. (Friday, 13 September)
• RE: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: Untyped Literal Semantics (Monday, 9 September)
• Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags (Saturday, 7 September)
• Re: RDF Datatyping PART 1 [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002 -08-30] (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags (Friday, 6 September)
• RDF Datatyping PART 1 [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-30] (Friday, 6 September)
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate (Monday, 2 September)
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate (Monday, 2 September)

pat hayes

• Re: possible semantic bugs concerning domain and range (Saturday, 28 September)
• apologies (Friday, 27 September)
• a cunning plan (was: Re: On Consensus) (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: RDF lists (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: RDF lists (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: RDF lists (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: RDF lists (Friday, 20 September)
• RDF lists (Thursday, 19 September)
• Technical change to the RDFS MT (Wednesday, 18 September)
• handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags (Friday, 6 September)
• rdf(s):Literal and stuff like that (Friday, 6 September)

Patrick Stickler

• Proposal for Deferrment and Closure (was Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: why I object (was: Intentions of XMP) (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: datatype property in the statement object pair (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: datatype property in the statement object pair (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: a cunning plan (was: Re: On Consensus) (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: a cunning plan (was: Re: On Consensus) (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: Explanation? of difference between Patrick and Brian [was: Re: Intentions of XMP] (Friday, 27 September)
• Fw: Datatyping (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: a cunning plan (was: Re: On Consensus) (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: why I object (was: Intentions of XMP) (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: Intentions of XMP (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: why I object (was: Intentions of XMP) (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Intentions of XMP (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Intentions of XMP (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation (Thursday, 26 September)
• Fwd: Re: Intentions of XMP (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Intentions of XMP (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Tidy/untidy: that's all about assumptions, folks (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20 (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Tidy/untidy: that's all about assumptions, folks (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20 (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Tidy/untidy: that's all about assumptions, folks (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20 (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: monotonicity [was: Re: On Consensus] (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: monotonicity [was: Re: On Consensus] (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: The case for untidy literal semantics (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20 (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: On Consensus (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: The case for untidy literal semantics (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: The case for untidy literal semantics (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Tuesday, 24 September)
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Tuesday, 24 September)
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Tuesday, 24 September)
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Tuesday, 24 September)
• Re: xml:lang and XML infoset: two new datatypes (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: xml:lang and XML infoset: two new datatypes (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: syntax and semantics (Monday, 23 September)
• syntax and semantics (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: Abstract data model update - discussion (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals (Saturday, 21 September)
• Re: xml:lang and XML infoset: two new datatypes (Saturday, 21 September)
• Re: datatype explanations questions (Saturday, 21 September)
• Re: Erratum to XML 1.0 spec to allow xml:lang="" (Thursday, 19 September)
• Arguments for Value-Based Inline Literal Semantics (Tuesday, 17 September)
• Re: Datatypes, abstract syntax / data model. (Monday, 16 September)
• Re: abstract syntax representation of inline literals (Friday, 13 September)
• Re: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) (Friday, 13 September)
• Re: abstract syntax representation of inline literals (Friday, 13 September)
• Re: abstract syntax representation of inline literals (Friday, 13 September)
• Re: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1) (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case (Thursday, 12 September)
• Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1) (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: Datatyping, reification, syntactic tidyness (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1) (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1) (Tuesday, 10 September)
• Re: Untyped Literal Semantics (Tuesday, 10 September)
• Re: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1 (Tuesday, 10 September)
• Re: in line literal semantics (and some thoughts on CC/PP) (Tuesday, 10 September)
• Re: Untyped Literal Semantics (Monday, 9 September)
• Re: in line literal semantics (Monday, 9 September)
• Re: RDF Datatyping PART 1 [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002 -08-30] (Sunday, 8 September)
• Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: RDF Datatyping PART 1 [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002 -08-30] (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: Comments on datatyping draft (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Proposals for changes to current datatyping spec (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Proposals for changes to current datatyping spec (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Proposals for changes to current datatyping spec (Thursday, 5 September)

Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

• RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" (Wednesday, 4 September)
• RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Proposals for changes to current datatyping spec (Wednesday, 4 September)
• RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" (Wednesday, 4 September)
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Document structure (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: XML Base - should be used (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate (Monday, 2 September)
• RE: RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals (Monday, 2 September)
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate (Monday, 2 September)
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate (Monday, 2 September)
• RE: Datatyping, rdf?:Datatype unnecessary (Monday, 2 September)
• RE: type not specializable [was: datatypes status (Saturday, 31 August)
• RE: Datatypes Draft Questions & Comments (Saturday, 31 August)

Paul Grosso

• Fwd: Last call announcement for Namespaces 1.1 (Thursday, 5 September)

Sergey Melnik

• On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: Tidy/untidy: that's all about assumptions, folks (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Tidy/untidy: that's all about assumptions, folks (Thursday, 26 September)
• Tidy/untidy: that's all about assumptions, folks (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: xml:lang and XML infoset: two new datatypes (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: xml:lang and XML infoset: two new datatypes (Monday, 23 September)
• xml:lang and XML infoset: two new datatypes (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: abstract syntax representation of inline literals (Friday, 13 September)

Stephen Petschulat

• Re: clarify "inline literals" (Monday, 30 September)

Last message date: Monday, 30 September 2002 20:56:50 UTC