- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 10:55:26 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
>>>Jeremy Carroll said: > In the abstract syntax I could specify that either lang is oblig and > defaults to "" or that lang="" is illegal. Probably the former is most in > tune with XML. DaveB might then need some wordsmithing. The former seems more in line. In particular since using xml:lang="" gives a meaning: "it is considered that there is no language information available just as if xml:lang had not been specified" -- http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-2e-errata#E41 we could use that form of words. Dave
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2002 05:56:13 UTC