Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics

• From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
• Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 20:29:26 +0100
• To: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>, "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020923201747.031ace18@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>

At 13:17 21/09/2002 +0200, Jos De_Roo wrote:

>[regretting not to have been there, but was impossible]
>
>taking http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2002-09-20.html
>for the moment for granted
>
>[[[
>....
>[14:48:03] jjcscribe Vote: untidy 7, tidy 5.
>[14:48:11] jjcscribe DECIDED: untidy semantics.
>[14:48:22] jjcscribe DanC has outstanding dissent.
>]]]
>
>I'm recording outstanding dissent too !!!

Reading what you say below, perhaps you are not dissenting.  The question 
put was:

[[
  where you have an rdf;descipriton element containing a property element 
of <age>10</age> is that tidy or untidy.
]]

You are objecting to

   <a> <b> "foo" .

being untidy but that

   <a> <b> _:dt"foo" .

is ok.

Then, the question as put, if it translated to:

   <something> <age> _:dt"10" .

would you be ok with that?

Brian

Received on Monday, 23 September 2002 15:32:07 UTC