- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 14:39:51 +0200
- To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> >From > > > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0104.html > > > ><rdf:Description> > > <eg:prop rdf:datatype="&xsd;deciaml">2.00</eg:prop> > ></rdf:Description> > > > >is equal (i.e. syntactically) > > > ><rdf:Description> > > <eg:prop rdf:datatype="&xsd;deciaml">2.0</eg:prop> > ></rdf:Description> > > > > > >(We may first want to ask does the first entail [i.e. semantically] the > >second, and/or vice versa). > > RDF entail? RDFS entail? Other entail? Isomoprhic like an RDF/XML document and the corresponding N-triple document. Hence, also all possible entailments. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 12 September 2002 08:41:52 UTC