- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 01:47:27 +0200
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
[...]
> > so I guess we have
> >
> > =========================================================
> > rdfs:Datatype rdf:type rdfs:Class .
>
> Yes.
> And also, the following was omitted but true:
>
> rdfs:Datatype rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Class .
>
> > rdfs:Datatype rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Property .
>
> No. Where are you getting that from part 1?
> There is no datatype property idiom any longer.
well I now agree, but I got it from prehistory and
from http://www-nrc.nokia.com/sw/rdf-datatyping.html
5. RDF Schema for Datatyping
[[[
<rdfs:Class rdf:about="&rdfs;Datatype">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">RDF Datatype</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">
An RDF Datatype consists of a value space, a lexical space,
and an N:1 mapping from the lexical space to the value space.
</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="&rdf;Property"/>
</rdfs:Class>
]]]
but it is understood now as being the case that
rdfs:Datatype rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Class .
have a nice weekend
-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
PS I got running code with
support for typed literals a la <uri>"string"-la
qname"string"-la
_:lab"string"-la
and I will further focus on some testcases
Received on Friday, 6 September 2002 19:48:09 UTC