Re: monotonicity [was: Re: On Consensus]

[...]

> 3) I think we demonstrated before that nonmon can be avoided with tidy
> semantics if we introduce another property.  Now before I get jumped on
> from a great height, I think we have accepted that the user community
don't
> want to introduce multiple properties into their schemas.  I'm not
> suggesting that.
>
> But, when an application gets the bitsPerPixel property value as a string

> and converts it to an integer, we could think of that as creating a new
> property with a new value:
>
>     _:s <bitsPerPixelAsInteger> xsd:int"8" .
>
> I think that would be monotonic.

I think so too, and I really like your
reasoning, go on and we find it

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2002 05:46:15 UTC