- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:54:05 +0100 (BST)
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Patrick Stickler wrote: > OK. The short answer is yes, but it is you, and not Jena > that is presuming string based semantics. The question that this raises, then, is whether it is you, and not the adobe API, that is presuming value-based semantics :-) Sorry for the flippancy, but you appear to be saying that evidence from examining an API is primarily based on the views of the examiner. The examples you've uncovered are interesting, though: do they support the notion that the adobe api has value, not string-based semantics for datatyped literals? -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ "Impact of vulnerability: Run code of an attacker's choice Maximum Severity Rating: Moderate" -- M$ security bulletin
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 11:58:54 UTC