RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" from Brian McBride on 2002-09-04 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from September 2002)

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 11:26:23 +0100
To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020904112528.02cf1870@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>

At 13:09 04/09/2002 +0300, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:

[...]

> >
> > I think the question might be:
> >
> >    Should the abstract syntax of a datatyped literal have an xml:lang
> > component?
>
>I did not know this was an open issue.

Then please could you clarify the issue you are discussing in this thread.

Brian

Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2002 06:30:41 UTC