- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:50:51 +0100
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>, "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 17:40 24/09/2002 +0200, Jeremy Carroll wrote: [...] >My understanding of the tidy position is that this mapping is made by the >application at its own initiative, and it is unlicensed, or licensed only by >private channel. The way I tend to think of the tidy position on this is that the mapping is defined in the definition of the property. Its not that its necessarily private or unlicensed but it is unavailable to a generic RDF processor. As an example, the cc/pp bitsPerPixel property could be defined to be: A string which is the decimal representation of the integer number of bits per pixel Brian
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2002 12:53:40 UTC