RE: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case from Jeremy Carroll on 2002-09-11 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from September 2002)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:20:28 +0200
To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDKEBLCAAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>

> Which one?

From

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0104.html

<rdf:Description>
  <eg:prop rdf:datatype="&xsd;deciaml">2.00</eg:prop>
</rdf:Description>

is equal (i.e. syntactically)

<rdf:Description>
  <eg:prop rdf:datatype="&xsd;deciaml">2.0</eg:prop>
</rdf:Description>


(We may first want to ask does the first entail [i.e. semantically] the
second, and/or vice versa).

Jeremy

Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2002 10:21:00 UTC