Re: Datatyping, reification, syntactic tidyness

At 11:26 11/09/2002 +0200, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

[...]


>And I buy Guha's point at the Bristol F2F that with untidy literal semantics
>rdf:object refers to the syntax of the triple not its semantics.

That is reopening an old issue where I believe we have already decided the 
value of the reification properties do not denote the syntax.

Are you suggesting this treatment be special for rdf:object?  Just when it 
takes a literal value?

Brian

Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2002 07:59:09 UTC