- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:56:44 +0100
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 11:26 11/09/2002 +0200, Jeremy Carroll wrote: [...] >And I buy Guha's point at the Bristol F2F that with untidy literal semantics >rdf:object refers to the syntax of the triple not its semantics. That is reopening an old issue where I believe we have already decided the value of the reification properties do not denote the syntax. Are you suggesting this treatment be special for rdf:object? Just when it takes a literal value? Brian
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2002 07:59:09 UTC