[Bug 213] Spec inconsistent on PROPFIND/Depth:infinity
[Bug 212] Spec inconsistent on PROPFIND/Depth:infinity
[Bug 212] New: Spec inconsistent on PROPFIND/Depth:infinity
[Bug 213] New: Spec inconsistent on PROPFIND/Depth:infinity
[Bug 202] Move description of lock-null resources into appendix
[Bug 211] New: Inconsistencies about Destination header
[Bug 80] Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods
[Bug 181] error element
[Bug 80] Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods
[Bug 124] REPORT_OTHER_RESOURCE_LOCKED
[Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
[Bug 147] CLARIFY_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER_APPLICATION
[Bug 121] OVERWRITE_DELETE_ERROR_STATUS
[Bug 10] Round-tripping various information in properties
[Bug 10] Round-tripping various information in properties
Re-using 414 status codes (related to Bug 31)
[Bug 181] error element
[Bug 179] DAV:no-lock
[Bug 184] Clarifications requested for section 19.8 on hosting malicious content
[Bug 176] Etag requirements (unchanged body for resource)
[Bug 177] "PROPFIND status codes" section
[Bug 176] Etag requirements (unchanged body for resource)
[Bug 177] "PROPFIND status codes" section
[Bug 179] DAV:no-lock
[Bug 181] error element
[Bug 184] Clarifications requested for section 19.8 on hosting malicious content
[Bug 184] Section 19.8 added with no open issue nor WG consensus
[Bug 208] spec contradictory in ETag requirements
[Bug 184] Section 19.8 added with no open issue nor WG consensus
[Bug 207] Compliance class descriptions for "1" and "2"
[Bug 208] spec contradictory in ETag requirements
[Bug 209] invalid etag in example
[Bug 210] incorrect statement on PROPPATCH and property recurrence
[Bug 206] broken RFC2616 references for some DAV:get* properties
Question on GULP - properties defined as lockable, and content of a resource
- Re: Question on GULP - properties defined as lockable, and content of a resource
- Re: Question on GULP - properties defined as lockable, and content of a resource
Question on GULP - resources added to locked collection
[Bug 206] broken RFC2616 references for some DAV:get* properties
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
[Bug 171] If header grammar
[Bug 118] WHEN_TO_MULTISTATUS_FOR_DELETE_2
[Bug 107] Status 102 present; but status-uri response header removed
[Bug 104] Confusing new sentence in intro of COPY
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
[Bug 94] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs
[Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
[Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
[Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
[Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253
[Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253
Comments in XML-valued dead properties
[Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
[Bug 86] DAV header definitions should use RFC3864 templates
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
[Bug 10] Round-tripping various information in properties
[Bug 118] WHEN_TO_MULTISTATUS_FOR_DELETE_2
[Bug 104] Confusing new sentence in intro of COPY
Feedback on Bug 18
[Bug 171] If header grammar
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
[Bug 13] new ETag requirements
[Bug 208] spec contradictory in ETag requirements
[Bug 206] broken RFC2616 references for some DAV:get* properties
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
[Bug 181] error element
[Bug 142] URL_ENCODING_ISSUES
[Bug 141] UNLOCK_WITHOUT_GOOD_TOKEN
[Bug 138] UNLOCK_WHAT_URL
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
[Bug 13] new ETag requirements
[Bug 10] Round-tripping various information in properties
[Bug 80] Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods
[Bug 80] Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods
[Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME
[Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
[Bug 193] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCK
[Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
[Bug 171] If header grammar
[Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
[Bug 144] IF_HEADER_CHECKS_AFTER_OTHER_CHECKS
[Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME
[Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER
[Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME
[Bug 113] IMPLIED_LWS
[Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list
[Bug 62] href format
[Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
[Bug 52] "mandatory" properties
Forms-Based Authentication in DAV - Explore
[Bug 181] error element
Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
- Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
- Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
- Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
- Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
- Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
Schedule for finishing
[Bug 202] Move description of lock-null resources into appendix
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
[Bug 193] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCK
[Bug 193] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCK
[Bug 193] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCK
[Bug 194] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCKS_AND_COLLECTIONS
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
[Bug 195] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCKS_AND_COPYMOVE
[Bug 195] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCKS_AND_COPYMOVE
[Bug 195] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCKS_AND_COPYMOVE
[Bug 196] LOCK_ISSUES_ERROR_CODES
[Bug 196] LOCK_ISSUES_ERROR_CODES
[Bug 196] LOCK_ISSUES_ERROR_CODES
[Bug 197] LOCK_ISSUES_IF_HEADER
[Bug 197] LOCK_ISSUES_IF_HEADER
[Bug 197] LOCK_ISSUES_IF_HEADER
[Bug 202] Move description of lock-null resources into appendix
[Bug 198] LOCK_ISSUES_SHARED_LOCKS
[Bug 202] Move description of lock-null resources into appendix
[Bug 202] Move description of lock-null resources into appendix
[Bug 86] DAV header definitions should use RFC3864 templates
Document Action: 'Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) Redirect Reference Resources' to Experimental RFC
Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
- Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
- Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
- Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
- Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
- Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
- Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
- Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
- RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
- Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
- Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
- Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
- Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
- Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
- Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
- Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
- Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
- RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
[Bug 187] Changes section organization
[Bug 185] Missing interpunction in "previous authors" subsection
[Bug 182] whitespace in lock token in example
[Bug 180] Typo in 13.18, enhance reference
[Bug 168] Revert to original reference style
[Bug 88] typo in list
[Bug 68] Reference to XML spec
[Bug 63] typo in 13.16 "name" line
[Bug 57] incorrect section reference
[Bug 30] incorrect XML in example
[Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
[Bug 181] error element
[Bug 181] error element
[Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253
[Bug 210] New: incorrect statement on PROPPATCH and property recurrence
[Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253
[Bug 13] new ETag requirements
[Bug 209] New: invalid etag in example
[Bug 208] New: spec contradictory in ETag requirements
[Bug 147] CLARIFY_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER_APPLICATION
[Bug 147] CLARIFY_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER_APPLICATION
[Bug 147] CLARIFY_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER_APPLICATION
[Bug 121] OVERWRITE_DELETE_ERROR_STATUS
[Bug 121] OVERWRITE_DELETE_ERROR_STATUS
[Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
- BIND, was: [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
Bindings and permissions
Question for implementors: definition of Lock with bindings
[Bug 154] ADD_DEPTH_ZERO_DELETE
[Bug 154] ADD_DEPTH_ZERO_DELETE
[Bug 154] ADD_DEPTH_ZERO_DELETE
[Bug 156] HOW_ARE_TRAILING_SLASHES_USED
[Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
[Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302
[Bug 134] PROPFIND_INFINITY
[Bug 114] PUT_AND_INTERMEDIATE_COLLECTIONS
[Bug 123] MULTISTATUS_FROM_MKCOL
[Bug 121] OVERWRITE_DELETE_ERROR_STATUS
[Bug 118] WHEN_TO_MULTISTATUS_FOR_DELETE_2
[Bug 121] OVERWRITE_DELETE_ERROR_STATUS
[Bug 118] WHEN_TO_MULTISTATUS_FOR_DELETE_2
[Bug 117] WHEN_TO_MULTISTATUS_FOR_DELETE_1
[Bug 115] INTEROP_DELETE_AND_MULTISTATUS
[Bug 115] INTEROP_DELETE_AND_MULTISTATUS
[Bug 115] INTEROP_DELETE_AND_MULTISTATUS
[Bug 44] OPTIONS *
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-09.txt
[Bug 105] COPY for Collection Resources vs infinite loops
[Bug 207] New: Compliance class descriptions for "1" and "2"
[Bug 73] "Changes" section missing
[Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props
[Bug 166] XML_GUIDELINES_CONFORMANCE
[Bug 79] PUT for collections rationale
[Bug 127] PUT_ON_COLLECTION
[Bug 132] DEPTH_LOCK_AND_IF
[Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME
[Bug 125] COPY_INTO_YOURSELF_CLARIFY
[Bug 113] IMPLIED_LWS
[Bug 157] REMOVE_ETAG_SUPPORT_FOR_IF_HEADER
[Bug 104] Confusing new sentence in intro of COPY
[Bug 139] MUST_AN_IF_HEADER_CHECK_THE_ROOT_OF_URL
[Bug 147] CLARIFY_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER_APPLICATION
[Bug 144] IF_HEADER_CHECKS_AFTER_OTHER_CHECKS
[Bug 144] IF_HEADER_CHECKS_AFTER_OTHER_CHECKS
[Bug 159] ORDER_OF_HEADER_EVALUATION
[Bug 147] CLARIFY_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER_APPLICATION
[Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER
[Bug 163] REMOVE_NOT_SUPPORT_FROM_IF_HEADERS
[Bug 162] REMOVE_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER
[Bug 161] EVALUATE_ALL_OF_IF_HEADER
[Bug 144] IF_HEADER_CHECKS_AFTER_OTHER_CHECKS
[Bug 144] IF_HEADER_CHECKS_AFTER_OTHER_CHECKS
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
[Bug 160] IF_HEADERS_CAN_GET_LONG
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
[Bug 171] If header grammar
Tomorrows call
[Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
Do server store arbitrary content
- Re: Do server store arbitrary content
- Re: Do server store arbitrary content
Re: unsubscribe s.y.crompton@dl.ac.uk
[Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
[Bug 181] error element
[Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
[Fwd: RFC 4316 on Datatypes for Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) Properties]
[Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302
[Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302
[Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
[Bug 205] new MUST level requirement for LOCK on unmapped URLs
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
[Bug 42] Consider deprecating text/xml for XML request/response bodies
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
[Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list
[Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
[Bug 145] LOCKDISCOVERY_ON_UNLOCKED_RESOURCE
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
[Bug 113] IMPLIED_LWS
[Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER
[Bug 62] href format
[Bug 205] new MUST level requirement for LOCK on unmapped URLs
[Bug 152] SHOULD_A_SERVER_DETERMINE_MIMETYPE_OF_CONTENT
[Bug 152] SHOULD_A_SERVER_DETERMINE_MIMETYPE_OF_CONTENT
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
[Bug 42] Consider deprecating text/xml for XML request/response bodies
[Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302
[Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302
[Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302
[Bug 206] New: broken RFC2616 references for some DAV:get* properties
[Bug 72] Review references section
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
[Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302
[Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302
[Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list
[Bug 110] COMPLIANCE_RESOURCE
[Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
[Bug 169] Date header required?
[Bug 119] DATE_FORMAT_GETLASTMODIFIED
[Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
[Bug 145] LOCKDISCOVERY_ON_UNLOCKED_RESOURCE
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
[Bug 113] IMPLIED_LWS
[Bug 113] IMPLIED_LWS
[Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER
[Bug 62] href format
[Bug 205] New: new MUST level requirement for LOCK on unmapped URLs
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
[Bug 42] Consider deprecating text/xml for XML request/response bodies
[Bug 145] LOCKDISCOVERY_ON_UNLOCKED_RESOURCE
[Bug 148] SECTION_12_4_MENTIONS_HREF_ELEMENT
[Bug 166] XML_GUIDELINES_CONFORMANCE
[Bug 181] error element
[Bug 170] no mention of 424 in section 8.3.2
[Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302
[Bug 165] DAV_ERROR_SUPPORT
[Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253
[Bug 135] RESOURCETYPE_EXTENSION
[Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253
[Bug 164] HOW_DOES_WEBDAV_SUPPORT_VARIANTS
[Bug 137] OPTIONS_RESPONSE_VARIES_FOR_RESOURCES
[Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER
[Bug 153] CAN_HREF_BE_RELATIVE
[Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus
[Bug 126] EXTEND_UNDEFINED
[Bug 110] COMPLIANCE_RESOURCE
[Bug 44] OPTIONS *
[Bug 110] COMPLIANCE_RESOURCE
[Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list
[Bug 104] Confusing new sentence in intro of COPY
[Bug 101] Extensibility for dav:owner
[Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME
[Bug 150] SOURCE_PROPERTY_UNDERSPECIFIED
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
[Bug 60] If header evaluation when?
[Bug 140] UNLOCK_NEEDS_IF_HEADER
[Bug 169] Date header required?
[Bug 149] NEW_MULTIPUT_METHOD
[Bug 129] LOCK_BODY_SHOULD_BE_MUST
[Bug 116] OVERWRITE_DELETE_ALL_TOO_STRONG
[Bug 113] IMPLIED_LWS
[Bug 111] DEFINE_PRINCIPAL
[Bug 119] DATE_FORMAT_GETLASTMODIFIED
[Bug 192] LOCK_ISSUES_LOCK_URI_TYPE
[Bug 10] Round-tripping various information in properties
[Bug 146] PROP_ROUNDTRIP
[Bug 10] Round-tripping various information in properties
[Bug 191] LOCK_ISSUES_ACCESS_RIGHTS
[Bug 190] HTTP examples using RFC2629 markup
[Bug 102] lock tokens in examples
[Bug 87] broken XML source of spec
[Bug 183] Outdated references
[Bug 186] opaquelocktoken appendix
[Bug 186] opaquelocktoken appendix
[Bug 189] "RFC2518bis" in spec text
[Bug 199] Front matter editorial nits
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
[Bug 203] DAV:lockdiscovery in multistatus (8.11.8)
[Bug 201] LWS allowed in Coded-URL
[Bug 204] DAV:creationdate vs client sychronization
[Bug 62] href format
[Bug 60] If header evaluation when?
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
[Bug 58] MOVE status 403 description
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
[Bug 52] "mandatory" properties
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
[Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253
[Bug 51] Property behaviour upon COPY vs "remote COPY"
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
[Bug 44] OPTIONS *
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
[Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus
[Bug 42] Consider deprecating text/xml for XML request/response bodies
[Bug 32] DAV:displayname handling
[Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties
[Bug 26] URL syntax in PROPFIND
[Bug 156] HOW_ARE_TRAILING_SLASHES_USED
[Bug 16] Trailing slash required in collection names?
Review of RFC2518bis pre-draft
[Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253
[Bug 204] New: DAV:creationdate vs client sychronization
[Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
[Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
[Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253
[Bug 107] Status 102 present; but status-uri response header removed
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
[Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus
[Bug 6] Collection Lock vs MOVE with Overwrite
[Bug 93] Write Locks and Collections vs MOVE
[Bug 6] Collection Lock vs MOVE with Overwrite
[Bug 203] New: DAV:lockdiscovery in multistatus (8.11.8)
[Bug 202] Move description of lock-null resources into appendix
[Bug 202] New: Move description of lock-null resources into appendix
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
[Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
Implementations of draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
draft-ietf-webdav-quota-07.txt: DAV:quota-not-exceeded
OT but nice productivity hack: Yubnub to find RFCs, I-Ds and WGs
[Bug 120] DEEP_LOCK_ERROR_STATUS
[Bug 140] UNLOCK_NEEDS_IF_HEADER
[Bug 140] UNLOCK_NEEDS_IF_HEADER
[Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER
[Bug 136] LOCKS_SHOULD_THEY_USE_AN_IF_HEADER_TO_VERIFY
[Bug 132] DEPTH_LOCK_AND_IF
[Bug 132] DEPTH_LOCK_AND_IF
[Bug 124] REPORT_OTHER_RESOURCE_LOCKED
[Bug 124] REPORT_OTHER_RESOURCE_LOCKED
[Bug 120] DEEP_LOCK_ERROR_STATUS
[Bug 120] DEEP_LOCK_ERROR_STATUS
[Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- RE: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
- Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
[Bug 58] MOVE status 403 description
[Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
[Bug 107] Status 102 present; but status-uri response header removed
[Bug 107] Status 102 present; but status-uri response header removed
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
[Bug 105] COPY for Collection Resources vs infinite loops
[Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props
[Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props
[Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
[Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253
[Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253
[Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes
Agenda for 12/6 telecon
[Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props
[Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props
[Bug 186] opaquelocktoken appendix
[Bug 176] Etag requirements (unchanged body for resource)
[Bug 186] opaquelocktoken appendix
[Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER
[Bug 136] LOCKS_SHOULD_THEY_USE_AN_IF_HEADER_TO_VERIFY
[Bug 140] UNLOCK_NEEDS_IF_HEADER
[Bug 136] LOCKS_SHOULD_THEY_USE_AN_IF_HEADER_TO_VERIFY
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
[Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
[Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus
Proposal for response URLs in Multi-Status: always based on Request-URI
- Re: Proposal for response URLs in Multi-Status: always based on Request-URI
- Re: Proposal for response URLs in Multi-Status: always based on Request-URI
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
[Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
[Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
[Bug 201] LWS allowed in Coded-URL
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
[Bug 22] attributes on properties
[Bug 174] Terminology in 4.4: "namespace name in scope"
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
[Bug 201] LWS allowed in Coded-URL
[Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
[Bug 104] Confusing new sentence in intro of COPY
[Bug 99] Risks Connected with Lock Tokens
[Bug 80] Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods
[Bug 79] PUT for collections rationale
[Bug 59] failed LOCK response body
[Bug 56] 423 Locked in Multistatus for PROPPATCH?
[Bug 55] Multistatus format (empty)
[Bug 52] "mandatory" properties
[Bug 189] "RFC2518bis" in spec text
[Bug 189] "RFC2518bis" in spec text
[Bug 189] "RFC2518bis" in spec text
[Bug 175] Sectiion 8.1.3 unneeded
[Bug 175] Sectiion 8.1.3 unneeded
[Bug 178] Multistatus for DELETE
[Bug 128] LEVEL_OR_CLASS
[Bug 103] Start of introduction for DELETE confusing
[Bug 91] chapter name for lock token uri schemes
[Bug 128] LEVEL_OR_CLASS
[Bug 103] Start of introduction for DELETE confusing
[Bug 174] Terminology in 4.4: "namespace name in scope"
[Bug 90] broken RFC2277 reference
[Bug 174] Terminology in 4.4: "namespace name in scope"
[Bug 22] attributes on properties
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
[Bug 94] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs
[Bug 16] Trailing slash required in collection names?
[Bug 156] HOW_ARE_TRAILING_SLASHES_USED
[Bug 149] NEW_MULTIPUT_METHOD
agenda for 12/2 telecon
[Bug 16] Trailing slash required in collection names?
[Bug 16] Trailing slash required in collection names?
[Bug 72] Review references section
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
[Bug 35] RFC2606 compliance
[Bug 44] OPTIONS *
[Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
[Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties
[Bug 51] Property behaviour upon COPY vs "remote COPY"
[Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes
[Bug 41] Paragraph numbering/nesting broken in Section 13
[Bug 40] Definition of "null resource" gone
[Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties
[Bug 25] lock to unmapped URL
[Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
[Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
- Re: [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-webdav-mount-03.txt]
[Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production
[Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
[Bug 171] If header grammar
[Bug 7] Example for PROPFIND/allprop missing
[Bug 171] If header grammar
[Bug 186] opaquelocktoken appendix
[Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
[Bug 174] Terminology in 4.4: "namespace name in scope"
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
[Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes
[Bug 171] If header grammar
[Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
[Bug 94] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs
[Bug 94] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs
[Bug 93] Write Locks and Collections vs MOVE
[Bug 93] Write Locks and Collections vs MOVE
[Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
[Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
[Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties
[Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties
[Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties
[Bug 51] Property behaviour upon COPY vs "remote COPY"
[Bug 7] Example for PROPFIND/allprop missing
[Bug 7] Example for PROPFIND/allprop missing
[Bug 173] Info about <location> inside multistatus lost
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
[Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it
[Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
[Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
[Bug 9] XML namespace discussion
[Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags]
- Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags]
[Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
Agenda for 11/30 telecon
[Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
[Bug 13] new ETag requirements
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
[Bug 99] Risks Connected with Lock Tokens
[Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production
[Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production
[Bug 201] New: LWS allowed in Coded-URL
[Bug 73] "Changes" section missing
[Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props
[Bug 73] "Changes" section missing
[Bug 73] "Changes" section missing
Proposed changes
[Bug 171] If header grammar
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
[Bug 200] New: remove "bis" compliance class
[Bug 199] New: Front matter editorial nits
[Bug 51] Property behaviour upon COPY vs "remote COPY"
[Bug 93] Write Locks and Collections vs MOVE
[Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production
[Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production
[Bug 67] non-ASCII characters
[Bug 38] RFC2396bis update
[Bug 38] RFC2396bis update
[Bug 36] Appendix numbering
[Bug 34] property "URI"
[Bug 29] refreshing locks
[Bug 20] lock token example
[Bug 19] DAV:no-lock
[Bug 14] new requirements on ETags vs property changes
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
[Bug 60] If header evaluation when?
[Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
[Bug 73] "Changes" section missing
[Bug 62] href format
[Bug 40] Definition of "null resource" gone
[Bug 13] new ETag requirements
[Bug 86] DAV header definitions should use RFC3864 templates
[Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253
[Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253
[Bug 49] propfind XML description incorrect
[Bug 41] Paragraph numbering/nesting broken in Section 13
[Bug 41] Paragraph numbering/nesting broken in Section 13
[Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
[Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
[Bug 22] attributes on properties
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
[Bug 16] Trailing slash required in collection names?
[Bug 73] "Changes" section missing
[Bug 62] href format
[Bug 44] OPTIONS *
[Bug 25] lock to unmapped URL
[Bug 25] lock to unmapped URL
[Bug 25] lock to unmapped URL
[Bug 25] lock to unmapped URL
[Bug 40] Definition of "null resource" gone
[Bug 27] COPY vs live properties
[Bug 27] COPY vs live properties
[Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253
[Bug 49] propfind XML description incorrect
[Bug 25] lock to unmapped URL
[Bug 86] DAV header definitions should use RFC3864 templates
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
[Bug 44] OPTIONS *
[Bug 40] Definition of "null resource" gone
[Bug 27] COPY vs live properties
Issues for 11/24 Conference Call
HTTP Upload
Twice Weekly Conference Call
More mainly editorial changes
[Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it
[Bug 45] DAV request header
[Bug 43] "ill-formed" XML
[Bug 39] Syntax of property names in text content
[Bug 37] Sentence lost in introduction
[Bug 24] lost-update vs collections
Notes on call from today ...
- ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
- Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
- Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
- Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
[Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus
[Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus
[Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus
[Bug 45] DAV request header
[Bug 45] DAV request header
[Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
[Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
[Bug 43] "ill-formed" XML
[Bug 37] Sentence lost in introduction
[Bug 37] Sentence lost in introduction
Question on bug 15
[Bug 39] Syntax of property names in text content
[Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
[Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production
[Bug 192] LOCK_ISSUES_LOCK_URI_TYPE
[Bug 195] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCKS_AND_COPYMOVE
Fwd: [Bug 190] New: HTTP examples using RFC2629 markup
[Bug 41] Paragraph numbering/nesting broken in Section 13
[Bug 30] incorrect XML in example
[Bug 57] incorrect section reference
[Bug 63] typo in 13.16 "name" line
[Bug 68] Reference to XML spec
[Bug 88] typo in list
[Bug 88] typo in list
[Bug 89] whitespace introduced into hyphenated words
[Bug 168] Revert to original reference style
[Bug 180] Typo in 13.18, enhance reference
[Bug 182] whitespace in lock token in example
[Bug 187] Changes section organization
[Bug 185] Missing interpunction in "previous authors" subsection
[Bug 122] LOCK_ISSUES
[Bug 198] New: LOCK_ISSUES_SHARED_LOCKS
[Bug 197] New: LOCK_ISSUES_IF_HEADER
[Bug 196] New: LOCK_ISSUES_ERROR_CODES
[Bug 195] New: LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCKS_AND_COPYMOVE
[Bug 194] New: LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCKS_AND_COLLECTIONS
[Bug 193] New: LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCK
[Bug 192] New: LOCK_ISSUES_LOCK_URI_TYPE
[Bug 191] New: LOCK_ISSUES_ACCESS_RIGHTS
[Bug 190] New: HTTP examples using RFC2629 markup
[Bug 189] New: "RFC2518bis" in spec text
Fixes for editorial issues
[Bug 66] references style
[Bug 168] Revert to original reference style
[Bug 188] New: PROPFIND include-dead-props
[Bug 187] New: Changes section organization
[Bug 186] New: opaquelocktoken appendix
[Bug 185] New: Missing interpunction in "previous authors" subsection
[Bug 184] New: Section 19.8 added with no open issue nor WG consensus
[Bug 183] New: Outdated references
[Bug 182] New: whitespace in lock token in example
[Bug 181] New: error element
[Bug 180] New: Typo in 13.18, enhance reference
[Bug 177] "PROPFIND status codes" section
[Bug 179] New: DAV:no-lock
[Bug 178] New: Multistatus for DELETE
[Bug 177] New: "PROPFIND status codes" section
[Bug 176] New: Etag requirements (unchanged body for resource)
[Bug 175] New: Sectiion 8.1.3 unneeded
[Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
[Bug 174] New: Terminology in 4.4: "namespace name in scope"
[Bug 173] New: Info about <location> inside multistatus lost
[Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
BugZilla mail flood
[Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it
[Bug 170] no mention of 424 in section 8.3.2
[Bug 169] Date header required?
[Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
[Bug 167] XML_ENTITY_DOS
[Bug 165] DAV_ERROR_SUPPORT
[Bug 163] REMOVE_NOT_SUPPORT_FROM_IF_HEADERS
[Bug 162] REMOVE_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER
[Bug 160] IF_HEADERS_CAN_GET_LONG
[Bug 158] SHOULD_WE_SUPPORT_IRIS_AND_CHARMOD
[Bug 157] REMOVE_ETAG_SUPPORT_FOR_IF_HEADER
[Bug 155] INTEROPERABILITY_OF_102PROCESSING_STATUS_DEMONSTRATED
[Bug 107] Status 102 present; but status-uri response header removed
[Bug 154] ADD_DEPTH_ZERO_DELETE
[Bug 153] CAN_HREF_BE_RELATIVE
[Bug 151] HOW_DO_WE_ENCODE_FILENAMES_AS_URLS
[Bug 142] URL_ENCODING_ISSUES
[Bug 150] SOURCE_PROPERTY_UNDERSPECIFIED
[Bug 149] NEW_MULTIPUT_METHOD
[Bug 148] SECTION_12_4_MENTIONS_HREF_ELEMENT
[Bug 145] LOCKDISCOVERY_ON_UNLOCKED_RESOURCE
[Bug 142] URL_ENCODING_ISSUES
[Bug 140] UNLOCK_NEEDS_IF_HEADER
[Bug 137] OPTIONS_RESPONSE_VARIES_FOR_RESOURCES
[Bug 135] RESOURCETYPE_EXTENSION
[Bug 134] PROPFIND_INFINITY
[Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME
[Bug 130] IF_AND_AUTH
[Bug 129] LOCK_BODY_SHOULD_BE_MUST
[Bug 120] DEEP_LOCK_ERROR_STATUS
[Bug 119] DATE_FORMAT_GETLASTMODIFIED
[Bug 116] OVERWRITE_DELETE_ALL_TOO_STRONG
[Bug 113] IMPLIED_LWS
[Bug 111] DEFINE_PRINCIPAL
[Bug 107] Status 102 present; but status-uri response header removed
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
[Bug 105] COPY for Collection Resources vs infinite loops
[Bug 104] Confusing new sentence in intro of COPY
[Bug 103] Start of introduction for DELETE confusing
[Bug 102] lock tokens in examples
[Bug 101] Extensibility for dav:owner
[Bug 100] "Notes on HTTP Client Compatibility" useful?
[Bug 99] Risks Connected with Lock Tokens
[Bug 98] new error code descriptions, continued
[Bug 97] new error code descriptions
[Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list
[Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes
[Bug 94] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs
[Bug 93] Write Locks and Collections vs MOVE
[Bug 92] lock owner description
[Bug 91] chapter name for lock token uri schemes
[Bug 90] broken RFC2277 reference
[Bug 89] whitespace introduced into hyphenated words
[Bug 88] typo in list
[Bug 87] broken XML source of spec
[Bug 86] DAV header definitions should use RFC3864 templates
[Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
[Bug 80] Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods
[Bug 79] PUT for collections rationale
[Bug 73] "Changes" section missing
[Bug 72] Review references section
[Bug 68] Reference to XML spec
[Bug 67] non-ASCII characters
[Bug 66] references style
[Bug 63] typo in 13.16 "name" line
[Bug 62] href format
[Bug 60] If header evaluation when?
[Bug 59] failed LOCK response body
[Bug 58] MOVE status 403 description
[Bug 57] incorrect section reference
[Bug 56] 423 Locked in Multistatus for PROPPATCH?
[Bug 55] Multistatus format (empty)
[Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
[Bug 52] "mandatory" properties
[Bug 51] Property behaviour upon COPY vs "remote COPY"
[Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253
[Bug 49] propfind XML description incorrect
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
[Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus
[Bug 45] DAV request header
[Bug 44] OPTIONS *
[Bug 43] "ill-formed" XML
[Bug 42] Consider deprecating text/xml for XML request/response bodies
[Bug 41] Paragraph numbering/nesting broken in Section 13
[Bug 40] Definition of "null resource" gone
[Bug 38] RFC2396bis update
[Bug 37] Sentence lost in introduction
[Bug 35] RFC2606 compliance
[Bug 32] DAV:displayname handling
[Bug 30] incorrect XML in example
[Bug 13] new ETag requirements
[Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties
[Bug 27] COPY vs live properties
[Bug 26] URL syntax in PROPFIND
[Bug 25] lock to unmapped URL
[Bug 24] lost-update vs collections
[Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
[Bug 22] attributes on properties
[Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
[Bug 16] Trailing slash required in collection names?
[Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
[Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
[Bug 9] XML namespace discussion
[Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production
[Bug 7] Example for PROPFIND/allprop missing
[Bug 6] Collection Lock vs MOVE with Overwrite
Issues to address this coming week
Timeline for completion
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-08.txt
Fwd: XML InfoSet and property value preservation
- Re: Fwd: XML InfoSet and property value preservation
Draft -08 RFC2518bis
URI spec RFC2396 obsoleted by RFC3986
[Bug 102] lock tokens in examples
[Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it
[Bug 36] Appendix numbering
[Bug 34] property "URI"
[Bug 30] incorrect XML in example
[Bug 29] refreshing locks
[Bug 14] new requirements on ETags vs property changes
[Bug 20] lock token example
[Bug 19] DAV:no-lock
[Bug 14] new requirements on ETags vs property changes
[Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
[Bug 9] XML namespace discussion
[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-webdav-url-constraints-00.txt]
[Bug 20] lock token example
[Bug 61] invalid lock token in example
XML InfoSet and property value preservation
- Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation
- RE: XML InfoSet and property value preservation
- Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation
- Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation
- RE: XML InfoSet and property value preservation
- RE: XML InfoSet and property value preservation
- RE: XML InfoSet and property value preservation
- RE: XML InfoSet and property value preservation
- RE: XML InfoSet and property value preservation
[Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
[Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
[Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
[Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
[Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
[Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
FW: [Inquiry #83038] Publication requested for draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-13
Redirect draft status
Bridge for this week (and hopefully other weeks too)
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
[Bug 24] lost-update vs collections
[Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
[Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
URI scheme removal/permanence
on our bug tracking (and closing) process
[Bug 17] XML NS terminology
[Bug 14] new requirements on ETags vs property changes
[Bug 14] new requirements on ETags vs property changes
weekly bug phone call - moved to Thursday this week by popular request
[Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it
[Bug 172] New: Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it
[Bug 151] HOW_DO_WE_ENCODE_FILENAMES_AS_URLS
[Bug 154] ADD_DEPTH_ZERO_DELETE
[Bug 171] New: If header grammar
Test cases for "If" header checks
Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes
- Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes
- Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes
- Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes
- Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes
- Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes
- This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...)
- Re: This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...)
- Re: This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...)
- Re: This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...)
- Re: This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...)
- Re: This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...)
- Re: This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...)
- Re: This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...)
- Re: This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...)
- Re: This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...)
- Re: This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...)
- This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...)
- Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes
- Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes
- Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes
- Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes
Conference bridge for weekly bug phone call
[Bug 170] New: no mention of 424 in section 8.3.2
limit user per ip in mod_dav
Problem implementing simple WebDAV Server
[Bug 169] New: Date header required?
[Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
- Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
Phone call this Friday.
[Bug 26] URL syntax in PROPFIND
RFC2445bis: "424 Failed Dependency" missing in section "8.3.1 Status Codes for use with 207 (Multi-Status)"
new stuff in draft edits
Editing rfc2518bis.xml
[Bug 24] lost-update vs collections
[Bug 20] lock token example
[Bug 19] DAV:no-lock
[Bug 17] XML NS terminology
[Bug 9] XML namespace discussion
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
- Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
[Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
- Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
[Bug 168] New: Revert to original reference style
[Bug 37] Sentence lost in introduction
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-13.txt
[Bug 29] refreshing locks
[Bug 37] Sentence lost in introduction
[Bug 37] Sentence lost in introduction
[Bug 36] Appendix numbering
[Bug 36] Appendix numbering
[Bug 34] property "URI"
[Bug 34] property "URI"
[Bug 34] property "URI"
[Bug 32] DAV:displayname handling
[Bug 30] incorrect XML in example
[Bug 30] incorrect XML in example
[Bug 29] refreshing locks
[Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties
[Bug 26] URL syntax in PROPFIND
[Bug 26] URL syntax in PROPFIND
[Bug 26] URL syntax in PROPFIND
[Bug 25] lock to unmapped URL
[Bug 24] lost-update vs collections
[Bug 24] lost-update vs collections
[Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
[Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
[Bug 20] lock token example
[Bug 22] attributes on properties
[Bug 19] DAV:no-lock
[Bug 19] DAV:no-lock
[Bug 19] DAV:no-lock
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
[Bug 17] XML NS terminology
[Bug 17] XML NS terminology
[Bug 16] Trailing slash required in collection names?
[Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253
[Bug 13] new ETag requirements
[Bug 14] new requirements on ETags vs property changes
[Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
[Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
[Bug 7] Example for PROPFIND/allprop missing
[Bug 6] Collection Lock vs MOVE with Overwrite
[Bug 9] XML namespace discussion
[Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production
[Bug 167] New: XML_ENTITY_DOS
[Bug 166] New: XML_GUIDELINES_CONFORMANCE
[Bug 165] New: DAV_ERROR_SUPPORT
[Bug 164] New: HOW_DOES_WEBDAV_SUPPORT_VARIANTS
[Bug 163] New: REMOVE_NOT_SUPPORT_FROM_IF_HEADERS
[Bug 162] New: REMOVE_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER
[Bug 161] New: EVALUATE_ALL_OF_IF_HEADER
[Bug 160] New: IF_HEADERS_CAN_GET_LONG
[Bug 159] New: ORDER_OF_HEADER_EVALUATION
[Bug 158] New: SHOULD_WE_SUPPORT_IRIS_AND_CHARMOD
[Bug 157] New: REMOVE_ETAG_SUPPORT_FOR_IF_HEADER
[Bug 156] New: HOW_ARE_TRAILING_SLASHES_USED
[Bug 155] New: INTEROPERABILITY_OF_102PROCESSING_STATUS_DEMONSTRATED
[Bug 154] New: ADD_DEPTH_ZERO_DELETE
[Bug 153] New: CAN_HREF_BE_RELATIVE
[Bug 152] New: SHOULD_A_SERVER_DETERMINE_MIMETYPE_OF_CONTENT
[Bug 151] New: HOW_DO_WE_ENCODE_FILENAMES_AS_URLS
[Bug 150] New: SOURCE_PROPERTY_UNDERSPECIFIED
[Bug 149] New: NEW_MULTIPUT_METHOD
[Bug 148] New: SECTION_12_4_MENTIONS_HREF_ELEMENT
[Bug 147] New: CLARIFY_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER_APPLICATION
[Bug 146] New: PROP_ROUNDTRIP
[Bug 145] New: LOCKDISCOVERY_ON_UNLOCKED_RESOURCE
[Bug 144] New: IF_HEADER_CHECKS_AFTER_OTHER_CHECKS
[Bug 143] New: LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER
[Bug 142] New: URL_ENCODING_ISSUES
[Bug 141] New: UNLOCK_WITHOUT_GOOD_TOKEN
[Bug 140] New: UNLOCK_NEEDS_IF_HEADER
[Bug 139] New: MUST_AN_IF_HEADER_CHECK_THE_ROOT_OF_URL
[Bug 138] New: UNLOCK_WHAT_URL
[Bug 137] New: OPTIONS_RESPONSE_VARIES_FOR_RESOURCES
[Bug 136] New: LOCKS_SHOULD_THEY_USE_AN_IF_HEADER_TO_VERIFY
[Bug 135] New: RESOURCETYPE_EXTENSION
[Bug 134] New: PROPFIND_INFINITY
[Bug 133] New: LOCK_SEMANTICS
[Bug 132] New: DEPTH_LOCK_AND_IF
[Bug 131] New: DISPLAYNAME
[Bug 130] New: IF_AND_AUTH
[Bug 129] New: LOCK_BODY_SHOULD_BE_MUST
[Bug 128] New: LEVEL_OR_CLASS
[Bug 127] New: PUT_ON_COLLECTION
[Bug 126] New: EXTEND_UNDEFINED
[Bug 125] New: COPY_INTO_YOURSELF_CLARIFY
[Bug 124] New: REPORT_OTHER_RESOURCE_LOCKED
[Bug 123] New: MULTISTATUS_FROM_MKCOL
[Bug 122] New: LOCK_ISSUES
[Bug 121] New: OVERWRITE_DELETE_ERROR_STATUS
[Bug 120] New: DEEP_LOCK_ERROR_STATUS
[Bug 119] New: DATE_FORMAT_GETLASTMODIFIED
[Bug 118] New: WHEN_TO_MULTISTATUS_FOR_DELETE_2
[Bug 117] New: WHEN_TO_MULTISTATUS_FOR_DELETE_1
[Bug 116] New: OVERWRITE_DELETE_ALL_TOO_STRONG
[Bug 115] New: INTEROP_DELETE_AND_MULTISTATUS
[Bug 114] New: PUT_AND_INTERMEDIATE_COLLECTIONS
[Bug 113] New: IMPLIED_LWS
[Bug 112] New: MKCOL_AND_302
[Bug 111] New: DEFINE_PRINCIPAL
[Bug 110] New: COMPLIANCE_RESOURCE
[Bug 109] New: CONSISTENCY
[Bug 108] PROP_ATTR
[Bug 108] New: PROP_ATTR
[Bug 107] New: Status 102 present; but status-uri response header removed
[Bug 106] New: COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
[Bug 105] New: COPY for Collection Resources vs infinite loops
[Bug 104] New: Confusing new sentence in intro of COPY
[Bug 103] New: Start of introduction for DELETE confusing
[Bug 102] New: lock tokens in examples
[Bug 101] New: Extensibility for dav:owner
[Bug 100] New: "Notes on HTTP Client Compatibility" useful?
[Bug 99] New: Risks Connected with Lock Tokens
[Bug 98] New: new error code descriptions, continued
[Bug 97] New: new error code descriptions
[Bug 96] New: combining tagged list and untagged list
[Bug 95] New: possible LOCK response codes
[Bug 94] New: COPY and the Overwrite Header vs
[Bug 93] New: Write Locks and Collections vs MOVE
[Bug 92] New: lock owner description
[Bug 91] New: chapter name for lock token uri schemes
Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV)
- Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV)
- Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV)
- Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV)
- Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV)
- Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV)
- Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV)
- Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV)
[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-webdav-mount-02.txt]
ideas for research on wbedav required
Recurring Thursday Conf call
Conf call next Wednesday
Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis
- Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis