Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"

Cullen Jennings wrote:
> Another ignorant questions but ... Do existing servers include Locations
> headers. For any generic header X, if servers use it or clients expect it,
> then I would hope the spec talked about what needed to be in header X. If no
> one uses header X (and sound like you are saying it is hard to imagine
> anyone uses since no one knows what it means) then the spec should ignore it
> or say not to use it.

As far as I can tell, returning a "Location" response header with status 
207 is completely meaningless, and I'm not aware of any server doing that.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Saturday, 22 October 2005 08:26:21 UTC