- From: Bernard Desruisseaux <bernard.desruisseaux@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:23:17 -0500
- To: webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Me too. +1 for Proposal 1. Cheers, Bernard Geoffrey M Clemm wrote: > > I agree with Stefan that we should stay consistent (i.e. +1 > for Proposal 1). > > Cheers, > Geoff > > > Stefan wrote on 11/23/2005 01:10:28 PM: > > > > Am 23.11.2005 um 19:05 schrieb Cullen Jennings: > > > > > > > > > > > I am going to call consensus on this one in a week so give me your > > > input > > > before then.... > > > > > > The basic issue is that the names are sort of reverse what people think > > > because they are based on post conditions. ACL (and others) already > > > exists > > > and do it the reverse way. The question is we should we define future > > > stuff > > > in the "forward" way... > > > > > > Proposal 1: Stay consistent with ACL - put in note for implementers > > > that > > > points out this is reverse of what they might expect. > > > > +1. > > > > > Proposal 2: Switch the way we do it. Leave old document reverse and > > > make new > > > documents forward. > > > > -1. > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2005 21:23:34 UTC