Re: [Bug 19] DAV:no-lock

Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> 
> What about changing it to a MUST?  That makes it even more clear (and  
> we will get complaints about lower-case 'must' in the text)

Again: this follows by definition (only an IETF document/activity cab 
put things into the DAV: namespace, thus a URI using the DAV: scheme 
never can identify a valid lock token).

Furthermore, keep in mind that RFC2119 explicitly asks for using 
capitalized words sparingly.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2005 07:13:14 UTC