Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV)

I agree that this should be removed from the draft text until we have 
consensus that this resolves some significant issue (and like Julian,
I have not seen a compelling argument that it does).

And I agree that changes should not be made to the current draft until 
there
is at least consensus on the mailing list that there is a well-defined 
issue
that needs to be addressed.

Cheers,
Geoff

Julian wrote on 10/17/2005 05:35:40 PM:

> 
> Cullen Jennings wrote:
> > Do you really think this should be removed from the final RFC? On the 
call
> > the other day I though you were going to do some testing and come up 
with
> > some modifications for this text?
> 
> No, I think this is a misunderstanding. I really feel this text is both 
> misleading, and doesn't resolve any issue I'm aware of.
> 
> I'd really like all of us to agree on the approach not to make any 
> changes in the original spec unless we have a well-defined issue, and 
> working group consensus how to resolve it. If it ain't broke, don't fix 
it.
> 
> Best regards, Julian
>