- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:06:06 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18
elias@cse.ucsc.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|julian.reschke@greenbytes.de|lisa@osafoundation.org
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
------- Additional Comments From elias@cse.ucsc.edu 2005-11-25 11:06 -------
Rough consensus reached around the approach that Jim sugested in his email of
31, Oct: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2005OctDec/0436.html>
Briefly,
* add appendix documenting the problem, known 'hacks' (If header, 100-continue)
and their associated concerns with a preference for the If header approach
* don't add normative text
* look forward to a better solution in the future
Julian to do some testing as he is able, and Lisa to propose text on the list to
be hammered out...
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Friday, 25 November 2005 19:06:20 UTC