I'm not aware of XML providing a mechanism for defining multiple bindings to the same resource, so I don't see how an XML database implementation bears on this discussion. Cheers, Geoff Cullen wrote on 12/14/2005 07:20:12 PM: > > On 12/14/05 2:17 PM, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > > > Lisa Dusseault wrote: > >> > >> One could imagine the lock applying to the resource and to all its > >> bindings, considering the bindings to be part of the state of the > >> resource. If I recall, I think this is the model I'd always assumed > > > > Well, I'm not aware of a single server that supports multiple bindings > > to one resource, but which considers bindings as part of the state of > > the resource. Do you? > > I was just sort of thinking, if one implemented a server using a XML > database, and one used the database locks to implement the DAV LOCK, it > seems like you would end up with the lock locking the resource not the URI. > Perhaps that would just not be a legal way to implement it. I'm not making > an argument one way or another, I was just sort of pondering this and > wondering if my assumption that using the database lock to implement LOCK > would result in this model. >
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2005 02:33:41 UTC