- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:10:48 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=154 ejw@cs.ucsc.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From ejw@cs.ucsc.edu 2005-12-16 11:10 ------- Discussed during the 12/16/2005 teleconference. We noted that the driving case for implementing this feature is the desire to replicate file system semantics for delete on a collection, in which the delete succeeds only if the collection is entirely empty. It is currently difficult to achieve these semantics with WebDAV right now. One problem with simply introducing Depth 0 DELETE into the specification is that clients would then need a way to discover that this capability was supported. On the other hand, RFC 2518 explicitly states that servers MUST only allow Depth with value of infinity. This means that if 2518 servers receive a Depth 0 DELETE they should reject it, opening the possibility that 2518bis servers could allow it. There was also some discussion concerning whether we would want to address this problem using a state token for the collection, and then use the existing If header to test the state token. This might also have the benefit of supporting synchronization of collections as well. Julian will perform research on whether servers consistly implement the rejection semantics. Since this is part of a larger design space, and since we don't currently have a mandate to add new features, consensus was to resolve, WONTFIX. We encourage Julian to perform this research. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Friday, 16 December 2005 19:10:53 UTC