- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 21:21:21 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192
ejw@cs.ucsc.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From ejw@cs.ucsc.edu 2005-12-09 21:21 -------
I agree with Julian -- there isn't a compelling interoperability reason to add
additional information concerning new lock token URI types. Since we now have an
example of a second lock token URI type in the specification (the UUID URN), and
this was introduced without needing to indicate in its syntax that it's a lock
token, we seem to be able to introduce new lock token URI types without the
suggested change.
I'm closing this issue (with no changes to the specification) -- if someone else
feels strongly, they can reopen.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Saturday, 10 December 2005 05:21:46 UTC