- From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:33:39 -0800
- To: webdav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2005 17:33:59 UTC
Begin forwarded message: > From: "Lukas Mathis" <lukas.mathis@numcom.com> > Date: November 15, 2005 11:53:39 PM PST > To: <w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org> > Subject: RE: XML InfoSet and property value preservation > >> Extreme option: All InfoSet items MUST be preserved. [This clearly >> has the disadvantage of making existing implementations change their >> code to comply, but has the advantage of simplicity and enforcing the >> greatest consistency between servers.] > > Maybe I'm missing something, so I hope somebody can explain this to > me: > Are you arguing about whether a server should preserve data which > has no > specific semantic meaning (comments) or which could be changed to a > semantic equivalent in XML (namespace prefixes)? > > Maybe I don't understand the issue well enough to comment on it, > but I'd > tend to go with the last option - only require servers to preserve > that > which is really needed by clients. > > Lukas > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2005 17:33:59 UTC