Re: Question on bug 15

I agree with Stefan that we should stay consistent (i.e. +1
for Proposal 1).

Cheers,
Geoff


Stefan wrote on 11/23/2005 01:10:28 PM:
> 
> Am 23.11.2005 um 19:05 schrieb Cullen Jennings:
> 
> >
> >
> > I am going to call consensus on this one in a week so give me your 
> > input
> > before then....
> >
> > The basic issue is that the names are sort of reverse what people 
think
> > because they are based on post conditions. ACL (and others) already 
> > exists
> > and do it the reverse way. The question is we should we define future 
> > stuff
> > in the "forward" way...
> >
> > Proposal 1: Stay consistent with ACL - put in note for implementers 
> > that
> > points out this is reverse of what they might expect.
> 
> +1.
> 
> > Proposal 2: Switch the way we do it. Leave old document reverse and 
> > make new
> > documents forward.
> 
> -1.
> 
>