- From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:22:50 -0800
- To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: WebDav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
I think any future RFC could define something that was an restricted version of DAV. On 12/14/05 1:34 PM, "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@osafoundation.org> wrote: > Perhaps we should set a precedent for content-limited servers not to > advertise themselves as being fully functional WebDAV servers. That > would go for those CalDAV servers that can't handle non-event data in > calendars too, at least that restriction could be advertised on those > types of collections. There are probably a couple other restrictions I > would consider major hurdles for clients expecting to "do their WebDAV > thing" -- possibly some of the weak or no ETag cases or wierd > creationdate cases we've discussed before. > > Lisa > > On Dec 13, 2005, at 6:38 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> >> Cullen Jennings wrote: >>> On 12/13/05 2:33 PM, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >>>> Cullen Jennings wrote: >>>>> I have a questions for the WG. Can servers, within policy >>>>> constraints, be >>>>> expected to store arbitrary data. What I mean be the policy >>>>> constraints is >>>>> clearly a server might reject a request because it was too large, >>>>> or it >>>>> decided the file had a virus and it would not store it. But in >>>>> general, can >>>>> a client expect a WebDAV serve to be able to store say a HTML file? >>>> In general, no it can't. There are servers that accept only >>>> particular >>>> types of content (such as something running on top of an XML >>>> database). >>>> >>>> Would it be useful to allow clients to discover support for these >>>> kinds >>>> of things upfront? Sure, that's exactly I'd be happy to define a >>>> profile >>>> and give it a compliance class name for use in the DAV header (for >>>> example). >>>> >>>> Best regards, Julian >>> You keep mentioning the XML database but I would have expected them >>> to save >>> non XML data as more or less a BLOB. Am I missing something key here? >> >> You may or you may not. I can only provide hear-say here (I was >> referring to Slide running on top of certain Tamino instances; that's >> Software AG's XML database). >> >> Another example (as discussed before) would be a Calendar (CalDAV) or >> a Newsfeed (Atompub) server. Both may restrict the type of content you >> can put in specific places. >> >> Best regards, Julian >>
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2005 00:23:03 UTC