- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:24:56 -0700
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94
Summary: COPY and the Overwrite Header vs
Product: WebDAV-RFC2518-bis
Version: -07
Platform: Other
URL: http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-
rfc2518bis-07.html#rfc.section.8.9.4
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: 08. HTTP Methods for Distributed Authoring
AssignedTo: joe-bugzilla@cursive.net
ReportedBy: julian.reschke@greenbytes.de
QAContact: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
"(Extensions to WebDAV might not follow this rule to the letter but
must consider backwards compatibility with clients that expect COPY
to work this way.)"
Fact is RFC3253 does not follow this rule, and with good reasons. Seems to me
that RFC2518bis needs to reflect reality, instead of insisting it's somebody
else's problem.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2005 06:25:05 UTC