- From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:50:06 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: WebDav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
> Julian writes: > Back to this issue: > > 1) I'm not aware of any interop problems. > > 2) I'm not aware of anybody having asked about this. > > 3) I don't see any benefit in RFC2518bis making statements about > this, even if we *did* agree on what to say I have just read through this entire thread, and I agree with his statement above, and the conclusion Julian reached in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2005OctDec/0294.html Specifically: * I don't think there is a compelling need to disallow Location and 207 * I don't think we need any special mechanism for handling 3xx within a PROPFIND * I think it's fine if a client needs to retry a PROPFIND request if it receives a 3xx response I feel a slight desire to add a 3xx response to one of the PROPFIND 207 response examples in the text, but could live without it. Unless others chime in, I think we're seeing rough consensus for removing the current 8.1.3, whose text is described in Bug 12 within Bugzilla: http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12 - Jim
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2005 23:49:29 UTC