- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:26:50 -0700
- To: Jim Whitehead <ejw@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Cc: WebDav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
On Oct 28, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Jim Whitehead wrote:
>> What if I remove the header from the response example, in addition to
>> Jim's suggested change?
>>
>
> Urk, bad idea.
>
> The use of Location with MOVE is to be consistent with the semantics
> of the 201 response code.
>
Tacking on to my previous comment where I said I didn't think Location
was REQUIRED with 201... note that in RFC2518, we had an example of
MKCOL, where the response was 201 Created without a Location header:
8.3.3 Example - MKCOL
This example creates a collection called /webdisc/xfiles/ on the
server www.server.org.
>>Request
MKCOL /webdisc/xfiles/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.server.org
>>Response
HTTP/1.1 201 Created
-- Lisa
Received on Friday, 28 October 2005 22:27:10 UTC