- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:01:08 -0700
- To: Jim Whitehead <ejw@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, WebDav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
On Oct 28, 2005, at 2:51 PM, Jim Whitehead wrote:
> URI registrations for opaquelocktoken and DAV URI schemes made in RFC
> 2518 should still be considered active."
>
While looking at the IANA considerations section, this text caught my
eye:
This document defines two namespaces, the namespace of property
names, and the namespace of WebDAV-specific XML elements used within
property values.
I don't count two namespace, just one (DAV:). any objections if I fix
this sentence?
Lisa
Received on Friday, 28 October 2005 22:01:31 UTC