To clarify, would the Authorization header hacks I mentioned last week count as one of the known approaches? Lisa On Oct 31, 2005, at 10:56 AM, Cullen Jennings wrote: > > Unless more than one person objects in the next week, I'm going to > invoke one of my rare Chair privileges and claim that looks like > consensus to me too. > > On 10/31/05 10:05 AM, "Jim Whitehead" <ejw@soe.ucsc.edu> wrote: > >> However, I still think the right action here is: >> >> * Create a new appendix in 2518bis >> * In this appendix, document the problem >> * Describe the known approaches for addressing the problem (If >> approach, 100-continue approach) and their issues >> * Create a separate draft focusing just on the Force-Authenticate >> approach, and discuss on HTTP-WG list. >> >> Julian seems to think this is an OK approach. Geoff seems to think >> this is OK. Jim Luther agrees with the separate draft part. >> >> Dang if that doesn't seem like something approaching rough consensus >> to me. >> >> - Jim > >
Received on Monday, 31 October 2005 21:07:48 UTC