Re: [Bug 19] DAV:no-lock

I agree with Julian's suggested text change ("will never match"  
instead of "must never match").

- Jim


On Oct 18, 2005, at 12:13 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

>
> Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>
>> What about changing it to a MUST?  That makes it even more clear  
>> (and  we will get complaints about lower-case 'must' in the text)
>>
>
> Again: this follows by definition (only an IETF document/activity  
> cab put things into the DAV: namespace, thus a URI using the DAV:  
> scheme never can identify a valid lock token).
>
> Furthermore, keep in mind that RFC2119 explicitly asks for using  
> capitalized words sparingly.
>
> Best regards, Julian
>

Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2005 20:31:04 UTC