Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks

That works for me.  If others agree I can try to write up text.

Lisa

On Nov 18, 2005, at 9:31 AM, Geoffrey M Clemm wrote:

>
> From a lock privacy perspective, putting all information about the
> newly created lock in the lockdiscovery response to a LOCK
> request is (of course) no problem, so requiring that is fine with me.
>
> Perhaps the new text could require that full information about a LOCK
> be returned in the lockdiscovery response to a LOCK, while information
> about other locks is optional in the lockdiscovery response to a LOCK.
>
> Cheers,
>  Geoff
>
> Julian wrote on 11/18/2005 12:06:21 PM:
>  >
>  > Geoff, any input about how a server concerned with the privacy of 
> lock
>  > information would return the actual timeout value (as compared to 
> the
>  > one sent by the client)?