- From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:13:17 -0700
- To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- Cc: WebDav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 28 October 2005 22:12:17 UTC
> What if I remove the header from the response example, in addition > to Jim's suggested change? > Urk, bad idea. The use of Location with MOVE is to be consistent with the semantics of the 201 response code. So, the suggested text has to be more precise. Perhaps: "The use of the Location header with the 207 status code is intentionally undefined." However, even this I'm starting to feel is a bad idea. Why do we stop at Location? Why not create a table with all HTTP headers and state whether they should be used with 207? - Jim
Received on Friday, 28 October 2005 22:12:17 UTC