- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 16:35:48 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204 ejw@cs.ucsc.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From ejw@cs.ucsc.edu 2005-12-09 16:35 ------- One possible scenario for performing synchronization would be for a client to perform a search looking for all resources with more recent creationdate times than the last time the client had performed the search. This would allow the client to discover all new resources since the last synch time. They would, of course, have to perform a separate request looking for those resources that they already knew about that had changed since the last synch. This has the benefit of allowing lazy update of already known resources, since a local list of known resources could be kept up to date, while the actual contents of known resources would only be updated as needed. So, the previous scenario shows that there is a non-braindead synch scenario that might consider using creationdate as part of its synch strategy. As a result, adding some text into the specification noting that this is a bad idea seems useful. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Saturday, 10 December 2005 00:35:58 UTC