- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:34:30 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29
lisa@osafoundation.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From lisa@osafoundation.org 2005-11-15 15:34 -------
Note that this isn't quite the same meaning -- it is explicit that a server
doesn't have to accept the Timeout value in the lock refresh request. However
since timeouts chosen by clients have always been advisory, I believe this is
correct anyway. The proposed text will be in 08.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2005 23:34:41 UTC