- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:48:27 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11 ejw@cs.ucsc.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|julian.reschke@greenbytes.de|lisa@osafoundation.org ------- Additional Comments From ejw@cs.ucsc.edu 2005-11-23 09:48 ------- Teleconference consensus is to add language stating that a server receiving wht it considers to be a denial of service attack MAY return a 400 status code, or MAY drop the connection, at its discretion. The benefit of returning the status code is that it makes it possible for client implementors to have some insight into why a request was rejected (more so than if the connection was just dropped). However, the specification does not want to establish a strong policy here, because server implementations need flexibility in setting their own DoS handling policies. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2005 17:53:14 UTC