- From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:33:45 -0700
- To: Webdav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Elias, This sounds good to me. Only two tweaks * we had agreed that the new text proposals would be to the list, and not within Bugzilla * we had agreed that anyone can perform the verification task (except the editor who made the change) - Jim On Oct 27, 2005, at 11:19 AM, Elias Sinderson wrote: > > I believe the following captures our most recent discussion on the > meaning of a bugs status. > > NEW: The bug is new. > ASSIGNED: The assigned person will take point on proposing new text. > RESOLVED: The WG has reached rough concensus on a proposed change. > Note that the type of resolution (e.g. FIXED, INVALID...) is NOT > being used to indicate anything presently, as the available options > don't seem to fit our process very well. > VERIFIED: The text has been verified as included in the current > revision of draft (published to webdav.org). The status will be > changed to by the verifier. > CLOSED: The latest draft, including the agreed upon text, has been > submitted to IETF. > > We will look into modifying the available types of resolutions so > that they may more closely reflect our process... > > > Best, > Elias >
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2005 23:40:34 UTC