On Oct 31, 2005, at 2:05 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Lisa Dusseault wrote: >> On Oct 31, 2005, at 1:16 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: >>> Lisa Dusseault wrote: >>> >>>> The original question that brought up this issue was how to >>>> interpret the URLs inside the body of the Multi-Status if there was >>>> a Location >>> >>> >>> Is there any record on the mailing list of this issue? Has anybody >>> ever *seen* a 207 with a Location header? That is, why was this >>> question asked in the first place? >> Yes. At an Interop event. > > Is there any record on the mailing list of this issue? Sept 15, 2002, mail from me entitled "Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting". "- Clients get confused if host names change; Clients expect full/relative URLs? Dealt with in text on multistatus response" The Location header was what the server was using to indicate the host name redirection in this case, which I didn't mention in this brief summary unfortunately. The full details of the Interop -- e.g which client this was, and which server -- were never published, a decision we made in order to get broader participation in the Interop. Lisa
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2005 00:20:23 UTC