OK, I'll also change my vote to "no" (:-). The repositories I build are
"general content" repositories, but even they have sections of the
namespace (such as where "activities" live) which do not support arbitrary
content. I can see other applications (such as calendar management
applications) which would disallow arbitrary content (or at least severely
restrict where it can be placed).
Cheers,
Geoff
Julian wrote on 12/13/2005 05:33:28 PM:
>
> Cullen Jennings wrote:
> >
> > I have a questions for the WG. Can servers, within policy constraints,
be
> > expected to store arbitrary data. What I mean be the policy
constraints is
> > clearly a server might reject a request because it was too large, or
it
> > decided the file had a virus and it would not store it. But in
general, can
> > a client expect a WebDAV serve to be able to store say a HTML file?
>
> In general, no it can't. There are servers that accept only particular
> types of content (such as something running on top of an XML database).
>
> Would it be useful to allow clients to discover support for these kinds
> of things upfront? Sure, that's exactly I'd be happy to define a profile
> and give it a compliance class name for use in the DAV header (for
example).
>
> Best regards, Julian
>