- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:15:04 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179
lisa@osafoundation.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From lisa@osafoundation.org 2005-12-30 16:15 -------
The text that the no-lock is not special was already in the main If header
section text, but I'm happy to reiterate that in the not production section. I
prefer to keep the MUST language, however -- requirements are just so much
clearer than descriptive statements when we're able to use them.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Saturday, 31 December 2005 00:15:11 UTC