- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:05:47 -0800
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Good question, and I'm not sure -- it depends what the consequences are of assuming this distinction. It seemed like a useful distinction until it led to what, to me, were unexpected or undesired consequences. Do any servers implement multiple URLs, locking and DELETE (regardless of whether they support the exact model of BIND)? If so, what do existing implementations do? lisa On Dec 14, 2005, at 12:55 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Lisa Dusseault wrote: >> Well, I disagree with that model. I propose that all methods work >> the same on all bindings to a resource with respect to requiring the >> lock token, including DELETE. > > Hm. Trying to clarify...: are you also opposed to distinguish between > resources being locked and URLs being protected? Or is this > terminology you agree with that we can use in our discussions? > > Best regards, Julian >
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2005 21:06:08 UTC