>From a lock privacy perspective, putting all information about the newly created lock in the lockdiscovery response to a LOCK request is (of course) no problem, so requiring that is fine with me. Perhaps the new text could require that full information about a LOCK be returned in the lockdiscovery response to a LOCK, while information about other locks is optional in the lockdiscovery response to a LOCK. Cheers, Geoff Julian wrote on 11/18/2005 12:06:21 PM: > > Geoff, any input about how a server concerned with the privacy of lock > information would return the actual timeout value (as compared to the > one sent by the client)?
Received on Friday, 18 November 2005 17:31:01 UTC