minutes from 28 March
Review of JSON results format document
re-opening the DESCRIBE issue
- Re: re-opening the DESCRIBE issue
- Re: re-opening the DESCRIBE issue
- Re: re-opening the DESCRIBE issue
- Re: re-opening the DESCRIBE issue
test suite maintenance: Syntax vs. Query tests
apologies for no-show @ yesterday's telcon
[OK?] paper on RDF querying relevant to DAWG (and to current discussions)
Re: [Fwd: rif-ucr published] "Rule Interchange Format Use Cases and Requirements"
nameValueForms: ok to postpone?
agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Mar: in progress
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Mar: in progress
- agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Mar
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Mar: in progress
ORDER BY allows expression, SELECT does not
Protocol document: uri -> iri
1.115 of sparql protocol editor's draft
- Re: 1.115 of sparql protocol editor's draft
- Re: 1.115 of sparql protocol editor's draft (WSDL2 cite)
SPARQL+JSON
run Woden again?
Tests for LIMIT/OFFSET
PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR
- Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR
- Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR
- Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR
wsdl fun (re: ACTION: LeeF to try SPARQL WSDL files with Woden validator, report results.)
Meeting minutes: March 21st, 2006
likely regrets
LC comment status w.r.t. 2nd last call
agenda: RDF Data Access 21 March: in progress
Requirements coverage by test cases
regrets
automatic extraction of rq23 examples
Meeting minutes: March 14th, 2006
testcases
agenda RDF Data Access 14 Mar: suggestions?
- Regrets (was: Re: agenda RDF Data Access 14 Mar: suggestions?)
- Re: agenda RDF Data Access 14 Mar: suggestions?
\u escapes
proposed clarifications to the SPARQL grammar
[Last Call] Registration of media type application/sparql-query (fwd)
[Last Call] Registration of media type application/sparql-query
[Last Call] Registration of media type application/sparql-results+xml
new mailing list: public-sparql-dev
Re: Comments on Feb 20 Working Draft of SPARQL
draft minutes for ftf6 (02 - 03 March)
[Fwd: Re: Comment: don't use ? and $. Pick one. [OK?]]
[Fwd: Please take the W3C Technical Plenary Survey by 17 March.]
no DAWG agenda/teleconference this week
Notes on ter Horst's comments: SPARQL Query Language
RDF DAWG face to face meeting 2-3 Mar 2006
[Fwd: Comments on Feb 20 Working Draft of SPARQL]
[Fwd: SPARQL: arguments for built-in calls to generic?]
WD-rdf-sparql-query-20060220 is out; rdfSemantics follow-up
Meeting minutes : 2006-02-21
agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Feb
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Feb
- regrets [Was: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Feb]
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Feb
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Feb
ql wd qa check ok
Meeting Minutes - Feb 14
Meeting Minutes - Feb 14
Essay on the basic ideas of RDF graph syntax.
[ANNOUNCE] participate in DAWG next steps discussion
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] participate in DAWG next steps discussion
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] participate in DAWG next steps discussion
told bnodes example
Regrets for telephone conference today
rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP')
- Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP')
- Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP')
trouble with my ACTION
agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Feb
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Feb
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Feb
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Feb
[Fwd: draft SPARQL CR transition request]
rq23 edits (v1.638)
changelog ACTION
Minutes telcon 7th February
minutes, DAWG weekly 7-Feb
Comparing xsd:strings
Draft response to: [Fwd: SPARQL Comments (Personal)]
regrets
Questions on the latest SPARQL draft...
Regrets for next telephone conference 7th February 2006
"SPARQL++" example queries
Minutes of RDF Data Access 31 Jan
agenda RDF Data Access 31 Jan: in progress
(partial) regrets for jan 31
out for next three and half weeks
Blank nodes and predicates
Answer to: semantics are poorly specified
SPARQL Protocol for RDF LC Working Draft Published
Editorial changes in Section 2.5
- Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5
- Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5
- Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5
minutes of RDF Data Access 26 Jan
Draft response to: Re: major technical: blank nodes
- Re: Draft response to: Re: major technical: blank nodes
- Re: Draft response to: Re: major technical: blank nodes
- Re: Draft response to: Re: major technical: blank nodes
Editing rq23 for BGP matching
agenda: RDF Data Access 25 Jan
CONSTRUCT operator
Re: Email problems? (RE: Editorial thread for BGP matching)
The bloody theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge
- Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge
- Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge
olive branch (was: Re: FUB on Pat's proposal for BGP matching (please read))
FUB on Pat's proposal for BGP matching (please read)
agenda: RDF Data Access 24 Jan
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 24 Jan
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 24 Jan
- meeting record of RDF Data Access 24 Jan
FW: Grammar updated to reflect BGP/Constraint interpretation
- Re: FW: Grammar updated to reflect BGP/Constraint interpretation
- RE: FW: Grammar updated to reflect BGP/Constraint interpretation
- RE: FW: Grammar updated to reflect BGP/Constraint interpretation
Editorial thread for BGP matching
- Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching
- Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching
- Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching
- Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching
- Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching
- Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching
- Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching
- Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching
Intro + question
DAWG 19 Jan cancelled; tune in Tue 24 Jan
SHOULD use POST for expensive queries?
- Re: SHOULD use POST for expensive queries?
- Re: SHOULD use POST for expensive queries?
- Re: SHOULD use POST for expensive queries?
Intro + question
clarification of EBV returning an xsd: boolean@w3.org
integer added to supported data types (minor editorial
text on BASE constraints in rq23 (minor substantive)
Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans
- Re: Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans
- Re: Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans
- Re: Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans
apology/erratum
Minutes of the DAWG telecon 2006-Jan-17
Re: URI serialization issues
[Fwd: Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases]
[Fwd: minor technical on 10.3 Constructing an output graph]
TypePromotion tests
agenda: RDF Data Access 17 Jan (in progress)
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 17 Jan (in progress)
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 17 Jan (in progress)
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 17 Jan (in progress)
Re: all the SPARLQ policy stuff I can find
protcol trace of kanji1
Jan 12 Minutes
Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns)
- Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns)
- Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns)
- Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns)
- Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns)
- Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns)
- Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns)
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns)
- Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns)
- Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns)
- Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns)
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (rdfSemantics)
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
- Additional text for SPARQL matching extensibility
- Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns
7 tests to induct xsd:boolean into SPARQL
[Fwd: minor technical: A.7 grammar, rule [25] Constraint] punctuationSyntax
[Fwd: Major technical comment: identifier length]
[Fwd: major technical: no subqueries]
- Re: [Fwd: major technical: no subqueries]
- Re: [Fwd: major technical: no subqueries]
- Re: [Fwd: major technical: no subqueries]
- Re: [Fwd: major technical: no subqueries]
"the graphs referred to in the FROM clauses" [comment: major technical: underspecified errors]
valueTesting and divide-by-zero [comment: major technical: underspecified errors]
Text about rejecting queries with unacceptable dataset descriptions
protocol draft updated
agenda: RDF Data Access Thu 12 Jan 1600Z
comment: SPARQL and Unicode versions
why */* in inputSerialization of POST binding?
Re: bnodeification (was: Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns)
bnodeification (was: Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns)
- Re: bnodeification (was: Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns)
agenda: RDF Data Access 10 Jan 14:30Z
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 10 Jan 14:30Z
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 10 Jan 14:30Z
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 10 Jan 14:30Z
Regrets for Jan 12th and Jan 17th telecons
regrets for jan 10 telcon
minutes RDF Data Access 05 Jan
tweaked language for QueryRequestRefused
FW: Suspicious notation in SPARQL lexical rule for STRING_LITERAL_LONG1 [OK?]
Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
- Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
Query by Reference
agenda: RDF Data Access 5 Jan
Re: comment: QName production in SPARQL grammar; reconsider punctuationSyntax?
Re: how to subsume or handle warnings?
reminder: no DAWG telcon Tue 3 Jan; next telcon is Thu, 5 Jan 11amET/1600UTC
scribe for DAWG telcon Thu, 5 Jan, please?
Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns
- Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns
- Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns
- Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns
- Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns
- Proposed changes by FUB
- Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns