- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:07:00 -0600
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hypertext: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda plain text: 1. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of 2006-01-12T16:00Z ([2]local times) + Comments on the agenda? The actions under [3]test suite maintenance will likely get continued without discussion again + teleconference bridge: [4]tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333 + scribe: Elias o supplementary IRC chat: [5]irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg ([6]log to appear) + roll call + minutes from last time? see also: [7]irc log + PROPOSED: to meet again 17 Jan 1430Z; note DanC at risk; EricP to chair? scribe volunteer? 2. [8]Issue: wsdlAbstractProtocol + ACTION: KC to refine .wsdl description w.r.t. mime types + PROPOSED: that sparql-protocol-query.wsdl,v 1.15 2006/01/09 19:59:32 + @@epsilon, [9]protocol draft 1.89 2006/01/07 21:31:23 + @@delta addresses [10]issue wsdlAbstractProtocol 3. Toward updated protocol WD (and results format WD) + ACTION: EricP to pester W3C folks about unified comments on security and policy + ACTION: Jeen try to reproduces EliasT's protocol testing results + PROPOSED: to publish [11]protocol editor's draft version 1.89 2006/01/07 21:31:23 + @@changes reviewed by @@whom, [12]results format version 1.78 of 2006/01/04 15:59:22 + @@changes (example of... darn; forgot) reviewed by @@whom as 2nd Last Call WD. 4. issues [13]rdfSemantics, [14]owlDisjunction + ACTION: PatH revise Enrico's [15]"Proposed changes" on matching and entailment for solution sequences, esp w.r.t. RDFmerge/order + ACTION: Enrico to review draft text on matching and entailment for solution sequences + ACTION: JosD to make test case from [16]Sergio's basic query patterns examples + ACTION: DanC to review test README re "logically equivalent" vs graph equivalent 5. issues#valueTesting + ACTION EricP: add test case for support of xsd:boolean (ala (?a = ?b) = "true"^^xsd:boolean ) 6. Toward CR + [17]lc comment status: 26 open, 32 pending, and 36 closed as of v1.46 of 2006/01/11 18:44:29 (also: lists in editor's drafts) o ACTION: EricP to respond to, or at least consider, [18]BASE absolute IRIs of 9 Dec 2005 o Charmod conformance; my [19]OK? message has a forward reference to protocol LC. Reviewer asks for I18N WG review in reply + substantive changes since last call... 20 Dec rf1 change (jeen offered to do a test case). @@link to summary of changes in rq23. no changes to protocol that are observable on-the-wire, right? + Dependencies: o XQuery WG review ([20]rxd 13Sep) The "use XQuery" objection from NI was largely addressed by a presentation from Melton at XML2005 o meet requirements of ebXML Registry TC and freebXML Registry open source implementation? ([21]10 Nov from Farrukh) o charter calls for "architectural review" by [22]Semantic Web Best Practices and Deployment (SWBPD) Working Group [23]Wood 26 Sep is relevant, as Wood is a co-chair of SWBPD WG o [24]ietf-types review of application/sparql-results+xml , [25]ietf-types review of application/sparql-query + see also: [26]toward SPARQL CR, PR, REC, press releases... schedule review Dan Connolly (Monday, 3 October) 7. test suite maintenance + ACTION: AndyS to Make the decimal/double test changes for later WG approval [27]DONE + ACTION: EricP to fix test schema to match manifest with negative tests [recorded in [28]09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action16] + ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple + ACTION DaveB: add to test suite the temperature case from comment on truth tables in [29]commentor's message [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ [2] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=01&day=12&year=2006&hour=16&min=00&sec=0&p1=0 [4] tel:+1.617.761.6200 [5] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg [6] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/12-dawg-irc [7] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/10-dawg-irc [8] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#wsdlAbstractProtocol [9] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ [10] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#wsdlAbstractProtocol [11] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ [12] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ [13] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#rdfSemantics [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#owlDisjunction [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0030.html [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0021.html [17] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html [18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Dec/0008 [19] http://www.w3.org/mid/1122559086.31751.171.camel@localhost [20] http://www.w3.org/mid/20050913082804661.00000000668@amalhotr-pc [21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0267.html [22] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/BestPractices/ [23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Sep/0077.html [24] http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2005-November/000895.html [25] http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2005-November/000894.html [26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0003.html [27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0335.html [28] http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action16 [29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Aug/0030.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2006 19:07:08 UTC