- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:07:00 -0600
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hypertext: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda
plain text:
1. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of 2006-01-12T16:00Z
([2]local times)
+ Comments on the agenda? The actions under [3]test suite
maintenance will likely get continued without discussion
again
+ teleconference bridge: [4]tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
+ scribe: Elias
o supplementary IRC chat: [5]irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
([6]log to appear)
+ roll call
+ minutes from last time? see also: [7]irc log
+ PROPOSED: to meet again 17 Jan 1430Z; note DanC at risk;
EricP to chair? scribe volunteer?
2. [8]Issue: wsdlAbstractProtocol
+ ACTION: KC to refine .wsdl description w.r.t. mime types
+ PROPOSED: that sparql-protocol-query.wsdl,v 1.15 2006/01/09
19:59:32 + @@epsilon, [9]protocol draft 1.89 2006/01/07
21:31:23 + @@delta addresses [10]issue wsdlAbstractProtocol
3. Toward updated protocol WD (and results format WD)
+ ACTION: EricP to pester W3C folks about unified comments on
security and policy
+ ACTION: Jeen try to reproduces EliasT's protocol testing
results
+ PROPOSED: to publish [11]protocol editor's draft version
1.89 2006/01/07 21:31:23 + @@changes reviewed by @@whom,
[12]results format version 1.78 of 2006/01/04 15:59:22 +
@@changes (example of... darn; forgot) reviewed by @@whom
as 2nd Last Call WD.
4. issues [13]rdfSemantics, [14]owlDisjunction
+ ACTION: PatH revise Enrico's [15]"Proposed changes" on
matching and entailment for solution sequences, esp w.r.t.
RDFmerge/order
+ ACTION: Enrico to review draft text on matching and
entailment for solution sequences
+ ACTION: JosD to make test case from [16]Sergio's basic
query patterns examples
+ ACTION: DanC to review test README re "logically
equivalent" vs graph equivalent
5. issues#valueTesting
+ ACTION EricP: add test case for support of xsd:boolean (ala
(?a = ?b) = "true"^^xsd:boolean )
6. Toward CR
+ [17]lc comment status: 26 open, 32 pending, and 36 closed
as of v1.46 of 2006/01/11 18:44:29 (also: lists in editor's
drafts)
o ACTION: EricP to respond to, or at least consider,
[18]BASE absolute IRIs of 9 Dec 2005
o Charmod conformance; my [19]OK? message has a forward
reference to protocol LC. Reviewer asks for I18N WG
review in reply
+ substantive changes since last call... 20 Dec rf1 change
(jeen offered to do a test case). @@link to summary of
changes in rq23. no changes to protocol that are observable
on-the-wire, right?
+ Dependencies:
o XQuery WG review ([20]rxd 13Sep)
The "use XQuery" objection from NI was largely
addressed by a presentation from Melton at XML2005
o meet requirements of ebXML Registry TC and freebXML
Registry open source implementation? ([21]10 Nov from
Farrukh)
o charter calls for "architectural review" by
[22]Semantic Web Best Practices and Deployment (SWBPD)
Working Group
[23]Wood 26 Sep is relevant, as Wood is a co-chair of
SWBPD WG
o [24]ietf-types review of
application/sparql-results+xml , [25]ietf-types review
of application/sparql-query
+ see also: [26]toward SPARQL CR, PR, REC, press releases...
schedule review Dan Connolly (Monday, 3 October)
7. test suite maintenance
+ ACTION: AndyS to Make the decimal/double test changes for
later WG approval [27]DONE
+ ACTION: EricP to fix test schema to match manifest with
negative tests [recorded in
[28]09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action16]
+ ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on
op:dateTime triple
+ ACTION DaveB: add to test suite the temperature case from
comment on truth tables in [29]commentor's message
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
[2] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=01&day=12&year=2006&hour=16&min=00&sec=0&p1=0
[4] tel:+1.617.761.6200
[5] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
[6] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/12-dawg-irc
[7] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/10-dawg-irc
[8] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#wsdlAbstractProtocol
[9] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/
[10] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#wsdlAbstractProtocol
[11] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/
[12] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/
[13] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#rdfSemantics
[14] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#owlDisjunction
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0030.html
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0021.html
[17] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Dec/0008
[19] http://www.w3.org/mid/1122559086.31751.171.camel@localhost
[20] http://www.w3.org/mid/20050913082804661.00000000668@amalhotr-pc
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0267.html
[22] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/BestPractices/
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Sep/0077.html
[24] http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2005-November/000895.html
[25] http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2005-November/000894.html
[26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0003.html
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0335.html
[28] http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action16
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Aug/0030.html
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2006 19:07:08 UTC