Re: [Fwd: Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases]

On Jan 17, 2006, at 9:06 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:57:18PM +0100, Jeen Broekstra wrote:
>>
>> Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>>
>>> Comment on old syntax tests.  What happens about the approved ones?
>>>
>>> Some at least, are named "*oldsyntax" in HTML document but I guess
>>> people also go straight to the directory structure.
>>>
>>> Is there anyway to get a listing of the tests that are current?  I 
>>> sthat
>>> part of CR work?
>>
>> Is there any reason to keep the old tests around as-is rather than 
>> just
>> updating them to current syntax?
>
> I propose that the WG decide that test editors have licence to update
> any approved test to follow syntax changes.

That's more of a process change than I know how to handle.
Let's please keep it where changing an approved test needs explicit WG 
OK.

I wonder how we got out of sync? I try to keep the tests consistent
with WG decisions.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 14:25:33 UTC