Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR

On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 15:20 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:

> About "major technical: underspecified errors," we withdrew
> my action in the 21 Mar meeting.

Oops; the minutes show it continued. Hmm. Maybe I got confused.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0465.html


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Sunday, 26 March 2006 22:36:16 UTC