- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:15:56 -0600
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
hypertext: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda
plain text:
1. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of 2006-01-24T14:30Z
([2]local times)
+ Comments on the agenda? sorry it's late again. And I
haven't updated the [3]comment status in the last few days
+ teleconference bridge: [4]tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
+ scribe: libby
o supplementary IRC chat: [5]irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
([6]log to appear)
+ roll call
+ PROPOSED: to approve [7]RDF Data Access Working Group -- 17
Jan 2006 as a true record
+ PROPOSED: to meet again Thu, 26 Jan 1600Z; recruit scribe;
confirm chair
+ Let's note these done without discussion:
o ACTION: KC to send an [OK?] msg re HTTP Status Codes
for QueryRequestRefused and to paul etc. [8]done
o ACTION: EricP to respond to, or at least consider,
[9]BASE absolute IRIs of 9 Dec 2005. [10]done
+ Let's continue these without discussion: @@
2. Toward updated protocol WD (and results format WD)
+ ACTION: DanC to noodle on status, publish
3. issues [11]rdfSemantics, [12]owlDisjunction
+ ACTION: DanC to review test README re "logically
equivalent" vs graph equivalent. [13]done. Steve OK to make
that change? somebody else?
+ ACTION: PatH revise Enrico's [14]"Proposed changes" on
matching and entailment for solution sequences, esp w.r.t.
RDFmerge/order. seems done; there has certainly been lots
of relevant mail
+ ACTION: Enrico to review draft text on matching and
entailment for solution sequences seems done; there has
certainly been lots of relevant mail
+ ACTION: JosD to make test case from [15]Sergio's basic
query patterns examples
Note about 5 relevant comments, which seem to be addressed by
the editor's draft.
PROPOSED: that [16]SPARQL QL editor's draft v1.613 2006/01/23
13:13:08 addresses issue rdfSemantics and is sufficient to
postpone issue owlDisjunction.
4. issues#valueTesting
+ ACTION EricP: add test case for support of xsd:boolean (ala
(?a = ?b) = "true"^^xsd:boolean ) — [17]DONE
We approved some tests last week; I see Revision 1.608
2006/01/18 01:33:37 eric ~ clarify value of an EBV per message
to DAWG. Are we done? PROPOSED that we are.
5. Toward CR
+ [18]lc comment status: 26 open, 32 pending, and 36 closed
as of v1.46 of 2006/01/11 18:44:29 (also: lists in editor's
drafts)
o Charmod conformance; my [19]OK? message has a forward
reference to protocol LC. Reviewer asks for I18N WG
review in reply
+ substantive changes since last call... 20 Dec rf1 change
(jeen offered to do a test case). @@link to summary of
changes in rq23. no changes to protocol that are observable
on-the-wire, right?
+ Dependencies:
o XQuery WG review ([20]rxd 13Sep)
The "use XQuery" objection from NI was largely
addressed by a presentation from Melton at XML2005
o meet requirements of ebXML Registry TC and freebXML
Registry open source implementation? ([21]10 Nov from
Farrukh)
o charter calls for "architectural review" by
[22]Semantic Web Best Practices and Deployment (SWBPD)
Working Group
[23]Wood 26 Sep is relevant, as Wood is a co-chair of
SWBPD WG
o [24]ietf-types review of
application/sparql-results+xml , [25]ietf-types review
of application/sparql-query
+ see also: [26]toward SPARQL CR, PR, REC, press releases...
schedule review Dan Connolly (Monday, 3 October)
6. test suite maintenance
+ ACTION: Jeen try to reproduces EliasT's protocol testing
results
+ ACTION: AndyS to Make the decimal/double test changes for
later WG approval [27]DONE
+ ACTION: EricP to fix test schema to match manifest with
negative tests [recorded in
[28]09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action16]
+ ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on
op:dateTime triple
+ ACTION DaveB: add to test suite the temperature case from
comment on truth tables in [29]commentor's message
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
[2] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=01&day=24&year=2006&hour=14&min=30&sec=0&p1=0
[3] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html
[4] tel:+1.617.761.6200
[5] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
[6] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-dawg-irc
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/att-0138/17-dawg-minutes-edited.htm
[8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Jan/0104
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Dec/0008
[10] http://www.w3.org/mid/20060117074412.GU17752@w3.org
[11] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#rdfSemantics
[12] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#owlDisjunction
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0145.html
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0030.html
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0021.html
[16] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/
[17] http://www.w3.org/mid/20060113014908.GI7513@w3.org
[18] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html
[19] http://www.w3.org/mid/1122559086.31751.171.camel@localhost
[20] http://www.w3.org/mid/20050913082804661.00000000668@amalhotr-pc
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0267.html
[22] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/BestPractices/
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Sep/0077.html
[24] http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2005-November/000895.html
[25] http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2005-November/000894.html
[26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0003.html
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0335.html
[28] http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action16
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Aug/0030.html
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 19:16:01 UTC