- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:26:30 -0000
- To: <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Some more tests added to the syntax collection.
Andy
-------- Original Message --------
> From: Seaborne, Andy <>
> Date: 05 January 2006 15:29
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Let's try to use the SPARQL grammar rule
> >
> > [80] STRING_LITERAL_LONG1 ::=
> > "'''" ( [^'\] | ECHAR | ("'" [^']) | ("''" [^']) )* "'''"
> >
> > to parse a string '''some-plain-text''\\more-plain-text'''
> >
> > It seemes to me that it is parsed as
> > -- starting "'''";
> > -- "some-plain-text", in a char-by-char loop,
> > -- "''\", matching ("''" [^']),
> > -- "\m", oops, this does not match ECHAR.
> > -- ore-plain-text''' is parsed by error recovery code.
> >
> > I believe that the proper formal notation is
> >
> > [80] STRING_LITERAL_LONG1 ::=
> > "'''" ( ("'" ("'"?))? ([^'\] | ECHAR) )* "'''"
> >
> > Unfortunately, this is less readable.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Ivan Mikhailov
> > OpenLink Software.
>
> Ivan,
>
> Thanks for the comment - I've fixed the grammar
>
> [80] STRING_LITERAL_LONG1 ::=
> "'''" ( ( "'" | "''" )? ( [^'\] | ECHAR ) )* "'''"
>
> [81] STRING_LITERAL_LONG2 ::=
> '"""' ( ( '"' | '""' )? ( [^"\] | ECHAR ) )* '"""'
>
> I have also added tests for these cases:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#syntax-lit-NN-rq
>
>
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/SyntaxFull/syntax-lit-NN
.rq
>
> for NN = 15 to 20
>
>
>
> Please let us know whether this reply addresses your comment.
>
> If you could additionally send a message with [closed] in the
> subject line, it would save us a little bit of bookkeeping.
>
> Thanks again,
> Andy
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2006 16:57:25 UTC